Kahle v. Gonzales
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Kahle v. Gonzales (previously named Kahle v. Ashcroft) is a First Amendment case that challenges the change in the copyright system of the United States from an opt-in system to an opt-out system.
Four plaintiffs, Brewster Kahle, the founder of the Internet Archive, Rick Prelinger, founder of Prelinger Archives, the Internet Archive and Prelinger Archives brought the suit against the government for changing the copyright regime. In the past, copyright renewal did not happen by default. Creators needed to renew copyrights after their terms expired to retain the exclusive right to reproduce their work. The Copyright Renewal Act of 1992 removed the renewal formality, so that all copyrights would last the same term. Now, creators must explicitly remove copyright if they do not desire it.
Working from the case law of Eldred v. Ashcroft, which challenged the extension of copyright, Lawrence Lessig argued that a change in copyright law as drastic as the change from opt-in to opt-out required a review in regards to freedom of speech. The plaintiffs argued that the limitations placed on speech and expression by copyright were drastically expanded and possibly too limiting.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard the oral arguments on November 13, 2006. [1] The 9th Circuit rejected Kahle's arguments in an opinion issued January 22, 2007. An eight-page opinion written by Ninth Circuit Judge Jerome Farris stated: "They (the plaintiffs) make essentially the same argument, in different form, that the Supreme Court rejected in Eldred. It fails here as well."[2]
[edit] References and further readings
Here is the decision: http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/1FABEA163F4C714A8825726B005A12F0/$file/0417434.pdf?openelement
Here is a reaction from an attorney involved: http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/5110
