User talk:Miranche

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 Welcome to the Wikipedia
2 I jos da te zamolim...
3 Image copyright problem with Image:Traj73004_helio_ecldto_52005.jpg
4 Glas
5 Visit
6 Ej, pa ti si ziv? :)
7 Bunyev language
8 WW2 chronology
9 Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts

[edit] Welcome to the Wikipedia

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Wikipedia:Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam [Spade] 13:03, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Was the Cetina-Una border of Croats and Serbs in the early Medieval Ages? HolyRomanEmperor 16:18, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Is that line generally accepted in Croatia? Also, you should know that they had some Croats living eastern closer to the Drina river; and you have Serbs living in-betweens of Vrbas and Una. Some source (I think a little too overrexaggerated) state that Serbs also lived across Una... But these were all in minority... HolyRomanEmperor 00:20, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Is that line generally accepted in Croatia? Also, you should know that they had some Croats living eastern closer to the Drina river; and you have Serbs living in-betweens of Vrbas and Una. Some sources (I think a little too overrexaggerated) state that Serbs also lived across Una... But these were all in minority... HolyRomanEmperor 00:20, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Ma, sve su ti to Hrbi i Srvati :)) ako razumiješ što hoću reći... HolyRomanEmperor 11:58, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

First off, there is no such thing as a Montenegrin language :) Second off, it isn't sporazumijevat. It is sporazumijevati :)) HolyRomanEmperor 22:18, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

I suggest that you change it? No? (that i) and add latin fro Serbian and cyrilic for "Montenegrin". P. S. in fact, we've got Istar Croato-Italian Dalmatian dialect :))) HolyRomanEmperor 13:17, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

May I comment that you are amongst the rare wikipedians with the largest quantity of sanity on the Internet? :) HolyRomanEmperor 21:33, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] I jos da te zamolim...

... da dodas templejt GNU kod sebe :) (koji sam upravo napravio) --millosh (talk (sr:)) 03:20, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Traj73004_helio_ecldto_52005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Traj73004_helio_ecldto_52005.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Glas

Trebaju mi glasovi pa ako bi mogo glasati ovdje[[1]] i ovdje[[2]]. Unaprijed ti zahvaljujem. Pozdrav!Luka Jačov 15:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Glasanje još traje za ovo [[3]] a gusto je pa bi te zamolio da glasaš. Unaprijed ti zahvaljujem. Pozdrav! Luka Jačov 10:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Visit

Hello Miranche & everybody at the Wikipedia Networks Team!

I've read your paper and also the one with Indiana University. I find them really interesting and in-line with what I would like to do. Besides wanting to say hello, I was also wondering if we could make a meeting - in person (I still long for those, specially in these digital days). I will be coming to Zagreb in December 2006, so it would be perfect to meet then.

Best, Vulpeto 09:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ej, pa ti si ziv? :)

Sad bas pogledah svoju watchlistu i ustanovih da si ipak medju zivima... Koji ti je mail aktivan sada? Cuo sam da si otisa u SAD. --millosh (talk (sr:)) 09:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bunyev language

Why don't you add the Bunyev language - [Template:User bu] - it know exists. --PaxEquilibrium 19:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WW2 chronology

Your message copied for continuity:

Hello! It seems that my weekend additions to the World War II article triggered the move of the "Military Chronology" section to the Timeline of World War II article. However, it seems to me that this article is now huge and difficult to navigate. Also, the content (synopsis vs day-by-day timeline) is qualitatively different. Do you think it would make sense to split this in two articles, the timeline as it used to be, and "Military Chronology of World War II" to contain the more descriptive parts? -- Miranche 20:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi there. :) ~~I'm not sure what additions you made over the weekend.~~ *looked at article history* Oh, those. No, it wasn't your edits (those were co-incidental), it was the cumulative additions over the last (probably) year or so. I don't know how long the chronology section has been growing, but it just seemd like it should be it's own page. The Timeline of World War II shouldn't've been started, since it's just a list. In fact, the interwiki WW2 timeline articles are actually titled chronologies, so I'd recommend making timeline redirect to chronology (are there any reasons not to do this? it should probably be a WP:MOVE, for the history's sake).

I agree with you on the navigatibility. I think the more generally titled World War II article shouldn't have the same level of detail as Chronology of World War II should. I expect the evolution of the chronology article will see the reduction of the timeline sections (or a grouping of timeline events by area, and insertion immediately after each chrono section heading, or something like that, maybe), and an increase in chronological prose, which was already really big before moving it out of WW2. I expect there's a group of editors who maintained the timeline, before I nosed in; they're probably not happy. Xaxafrad 22:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

(meh with continuity ;)

In that case, I'll take the chronology article and just remove the redirect. Xaxafrad 23:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts

Thanks for the detailed explanation! My logic was that "Yugoslav" is used solely to refer to the country, whereas "South Slavic" refers to the peoples. I'm not convinced that the ideology of Yugoslavism firmly did not include the Bulgarians (at least Bulgarians, such as Lyuben Karavelov if I remember correctly, were certainly part of the related movement for South Slavic unity), and some Bulgarian academicians have also attended it or taught at it (e.g. Lyubomir Miletich), so I thought Bulgarians were also to be included. Indeed, a footnote may be of use.

P.S. The distinction between Yugoslav (jugoslavski) and South Slavic (južnoslavjanski) exists in Bulgarian too. Todor →Bozhinov 17:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../m/i/r/User_talk%7EMiranche_c7e9.html"