User talk:206.191.73.51

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Sceptre ^(Talk) 03:10, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The following is a COMPLAINT AGAINST NESCIO for harassing user's about the Police State page

[edit] It seems that many users have had problems with Nescio's harassment and vandalism

Nescio, why do you continually harass other users and then falsly accuse them of "vandalism" or other wiki-infringements? Please, do not delete this comment, I am only here as a mediator and this is NOT a personal attack. Only a simple question as to what motivates you to defame other users.

Here are the examples that I have compiled since being introduced to this issue. We have Levine2112 who complains about your harassment on this talk page above. “I have not attacked you. Actually, quite the reverse. I have not exercized censorship. Quite the reverse. What's it called when you accuse others of being something that you actually are?”

Winstonsmith describes your actions as “rootless accusations of "vandalism" in response to my recent edit of the wikipedia article "police state" don't even pass the straight face test.”

Winstonsmith even took the time to write a letter to the administrators about your behavior.

Dear Administrators:

"I would like to file a complaint against user "nescio" for wanton vandalism of the article entitled "Police State". User Nescio has been deleting sections of the article he or she personally disagrees with e.g. historical police state examples " Chile under the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet" and "Argentina under the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional", as well as other examples . This childish and irrational behaviour has resulted in a blatant misrepresentation of the facts, which is detrimental to Wikipedia's credibility and accuracy. I have tried to reason with this user, but it is unfortunately to no avail.

Regretfully , I have no choice but to request that this user be blocked from editing at this time.

Sincerely yours,

User Winston Smith

Ajdz describes you as “the worst editor I have EVER encountered on wikipedia” while encouraging you to “Please stop this childish behavior.”

VinnyCee had his warnings to you about harassment deleted and reported you as a vandal *Nescio (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) has repeatedly reverted to prior revisions of the police state article after being instructed to view the discussion page. I then placed a warning on Nescio's talk page, which he promptly removed. He continues to remove the warnings. Nescio has requested sources for the addition, at least five have been provided[1], yet Nescio refuses to acknowledge their existence and insists on trying to incite an edit war. -- VinnyCee 17:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC) Nescio is continuing to remove edits and warnings of mine from his talk page [2] while falsely accusing me of stalking [3] and sock puppetry. -- VinnyCee 17:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

I have to say that Nescio and others had understandable grounds on which to suspect you of sockpuppetry. Fact is, you appeared on scene the day of/shortly after three genuine sockpuppets appeared, and you shared the same POV and short history of editing. Sophy's Duckling 20:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Please explain what makes you think that VinnyCee is a sockpuppet? Can you cite these actions of VinnyCee that are considered to be those of a sock-puppet? 203.129.217.6 20:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I just did. It turns out that Vinny Cee is not a sockpuppet (at least, of anything we checked), but there was good reason to suspect she was. Sophy's Duckling 20:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

So VinnyCee is not a sock puppet. This means that Nescio's accusation of him being a sock puppet is false. Did you "check" into whether the other accusations made by Nescio against other users are also false? I would bet that they are. 203.129.217.6 20:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

It seems that you harass anyone who attempts to edit the Police state article without your viewpoint. This is against WP:NPOV policy. Please stop harassing users otherwise more effective measures will have to be undertaken. -- 193.95.80.10 16:55, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

The edit wars have not been between you and only Nescio. They have been between only you and many other users. Sophy's Duckling 20:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

As expected, you removed this comment for discussion in violation of wikipedia’s vandalism rules. Please do not remove this again. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- 193.95.80.10 16:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Again, Nescio is in violation of the vandalism clause. As was predicted by the users who brought me into the discussion, Nescio has employed his moderator lackeys to ban anyone who is critical of his vandalism. Nescio is not above the rules of Wikipedia. It makes one wonder why he is such a proponent of not allowing anonymous users to post at Wikipedia. It's probably one's only recourse after being unjustly banned by his moderators. Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. . -- 202.164.166.154 18:27, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Another moderator has abused his or her powers to ban a user who is simply inquiring about why Nescio continually harasses users who do not share his point of view. Removing this inquiry is in itself a violation of WP:VAND. Please do not continue to remove this legitimate question. -- 62.121.68.159 19:14, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 210.212.194.34 00:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Please Stop Removing Warnings. 200.69.147.117 08:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Why do you continue to vandalise your own user page? Please leave user comments on this page. How can you rationalize that this inquiry is a "personal attack"? -- 210.92.181.152 09:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I think it is a personal attack, because you have singled out Nescio out of at least four editors who disagree with you emphatically. Nescio has shown good faith here, and your efforts to get him banned because he disagrees with you do not reflect well on your own good faith. Sophy's Duckling 20:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

In reality, quite the opposite is occuring. My efforts are focused on the goal of exposing Nescio's abuse of moderators good intentions in order to get others banned who do not share his point of view. 203.129.217.6 20:37, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and, just out of curiousity, WHY IS THIS NOT ON NESCIO'S USERPAGE?! Can someone reasonable please get it OFF the police state discussion? Sophy's Duckling 20:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

The reason why this is not on nescio's user page is because he keeps deleting it in violation of WP:VAND policy. This issue also pertains directly to this article since at least four users have been harassed and banned by Nescio's false accusations concerning this article. Ask him why he continues to delete this question about his "edits". -- 203.129.217.6 20:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I'd like to ask you why you (a) persist in disruption of this page and (b) won't sign in and insist on using so many open proxy IP addresses? Sophy's Duckling 21:01, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

(a) This is not a "disruption" of this page. This discussion pertains deirectly to anyone who wishes to edit this article because if they edit in a manner that Nescio does not agree with, they will likely be harassed and banned by Nescio and his false accusations. People should be outraged that users and/or moderators are abusing thier powers. (b) If I were to sign on under my username, it would most certainly be banned in short order. I wish to see this issue resolved for all parties involved, but I am not willing to risk my status as an editor because of Nescio's frivilous accusations. 203.129.217.6 21:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Don't wikipedians care that wikipedia admins are corrupt?

templates substituted by a bot as per Wikipedia:Template substitution Pegasusbot 07:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

---

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]