Wikipedia talk:Articles requested for more than a year
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
Please add all new comments on the bottom.
Please note, not all comments are in date-sequential order.
[edit] Reciprocal linking
Just wanted to point out that some of the links to the pages are due to the links being listed here in the first place. I suggest that some caution should be executed before backlinking special pages including user pages. Bfg 21:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not clear on what you are saying. meatclerk 23:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)bv
-
- Some of the pages uses scripts to update themselves. See for instance User:MCH-Bomb#Work requested by Wikipedia community, which listed the article request Rhoma Irami. But he didn't manually list the entry, the entry was just automatically gathered from this project page. There is no point in listing such pages as linking an article, as they provide no extra information. Bfg 07:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- I though that was what you were saying, but I was not clear. I agree that listing duplicated listing that are auto-bot-created makes no good sense. But how do I differentiate that from users working on a project. Like Pachypodium_ambongense, checking the backlinks to User:Tdwin476 and reading, indicates this is a long term project. Very nasty and very involved. I noted it and watch it, but that's all I can do. It was on the Category:Cleanup_by_month list, but I changed it to expert verify. In truth this person should cut back his ambitions, but who am I to say so - I have my own.
-
-
-
- Your comments? meatclerk 02:43, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Law
I am in the process of creating Stubs for all AR1 legal articles. I have been making Redirects to others that really should be put in with other articles, or are common mis-spellings. Finally, after a few days, I will erase the Blue Links. Is that O.K.? Do I need to create any special notes? Comments? Bearian 20:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- I am cleaning up some Blue links now.Bearian 14:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Should Legal services be redirected to Legal aid society? I'm not certain what is meant by legal services -- does it mean the Legal Aid Society, which provides free legal services to the poor, or does it mean a Retainer of a law firm, or the services that Lawyers provide? I'm just going to redirect, in a few days, if nobody else gets to it. Bearian 19:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Legal aid may me a better redirect target than the country specific Legal Aid Society; however, my personal view is that legal services is such a vague term that it probably shouldn't be an article at all. - SimonP 20:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
-
Allocation questionnaire is done! It's a British legal form. I learned a lot. We should have such a form in New York. Bearian 21:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Cessate does not appear to be more than a simple definition, i.e., to end, complete, extinguish, halt, especially in Real estate law. It also can refer to the process of change of status from Executory to Executed. Should this be redirected or created as a stub? I don't think it's notable enough for a separate article. Bearian 18:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Execution also exists as a disambiguation page. Would this be a better redirect? Bearian 23:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
I have made more suggested redirects for several articles in the Politics and law subsection. Bearian 19:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
I won't have a chance to work on more new articles until 10 April at earliest, but will cut out Blue links now. Bearian 18:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
What should be done with In house counsel and House counsel? I suggest redirecting them to General counsel , and perhaps adding a brief note re: synonyms and related terms. Bearian 14:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
I redirected Uni-causal to Causation (law). Bearian 23:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
