From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9cde/e9cde2e784fb79a36c3cba02002488e96aefccd5" alt="" |
This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Cat |
This article has been rated as Cat-Class on the quality scale. |
|
|
|
Editing Guidelines |
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
|
[edit] Definition
This category lacks any definition that makes it clear which films belong in the category, and which don't. For instance, in Inherit the Wind, when Drummond cross-examines Brady, he suggests that God may not have reckoned Creation in terms of ordinary 24-hour Earth days, but some longer period of time. This is a view that is held by many mainstream Christians to this day. So how does this film merit listing as atheistic?
--Tex 16:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- I see your line of reasoning in regards to Inherit the Wind. Myself I've only read reviews and the synopsis of the film, so I'll hold off on any personal opinions for now. I'll remove that entry. As for a definition, I've put a tentative one on the front.--P-Chan 17:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)