Talk:Axis of weasels
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is indeed plural, thank you please. [[User:Rex071404|Rex071404 
]] 05:22, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
...er the plural of weasel is weasels. At least it is where I come from. Please move the article accordingly or I will file it vFD. Sjc 05:25, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Yes, ha ha, my edit summary did indeed have a typo. [[User:Rex071404|Rex071404 ]] 05:27, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Also, I would appreciate it if people do not "redirect" this page. No editorial harm is caused by the plural version, which in fact is the correct one.
Also, since we now have a bona-fide disagreement, Wiki ediquette requires us to discuss this towards consensus 1st (prior to making threats). Feel free to do that here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Axis_of_weasles
Q: Why don't we consider re-directing the singular to the plural?
Also, please note that Meelar, a very well respected editor made an edit to the plural version tonight [1] and this edit clearly suggests that he has no problem with the plural version. Therefore I ask, why do you?
[[User:Rex071404|Rex071404 ]] 05:31, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Wasn't aware that the phrase was used in both singular and plural versions. MY BAD!!! Go ahead and revert the plural version, if it hasn't already been done. Dale Arnett 05:32, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- In all honesty I tell you that I have only heard it in the plural version. In fact Google returns over 400% more hits for the plural version [2] than the singular version [3] Let's talk, ok? [[User:Rex071404|Rex071404 ]] 05:43, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Re: "Unencyclopaedic, poorly written, not attributing the author of the quote etc etc". FYI: the article was originally copied verbatim from the singular version of the same. You did read the edit histories on both, yes?
[[User:Rex071404|Rex071404 ]]
