Talk:Bodmin and Wenford Railway
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] The neutrality of this article is disputed
I have placed an NPOV (neutrality is disputed) as the article states "In the future, the railway will extend alongside this footpath towards Wadebridge." The extension is only a plan. A plan which is very unlikely to ever be approved. There is large opposition to this extension. As there will not be enough room for the railway track and a cycle path. It is already very congested in the summer months with out it being made any narrower. The train enthusiasts already have enough track to "play" on. They do not need anymore.
The NPOV notice can only be removed if the article acknowledges that the extension really is only just a plan and that there is opposition to the extension. User:benjaminevans82 31st July 20:05
- I have removed the POV notice and given more information on the other side of the argument. Usually people who want to "play with trains" buy a Hornby set. The hard working volunteers on Heritage Railways are trying to retore an important transport link which most of them believe should never have been removed in the first place.
- Railways and cyclepaths can happily share a track, for example the Brampton Valley Way and the Northampton & Lamport Railway. -=# Amos E Wolfe talk #=- 13:11, 1 August 2006 (UTC)