From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
This article falls within the scope of the the Cornwall Wikiproject, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. Contributions and new members welcome, you can edit the attached page, do a task from our to-do list, or visit the project page, and contribute to discussion. |
| |
See drop down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
| Suggested article edit guidelines: |
- Articles are written using a standard set of headings (see suggestions for article structure here. This is to maintain consistency between Cornwall articles and improve the quality of entries through a constant style of writing. These headings are, however, plastic and in state of flux and although we welcome suggestions or improvements, we would appreciate discussionbefore any major changes to the layout yourself.
- Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid is your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
- At the the Cornwall Wikiproject we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise.
- These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish self-government movement, etc) and should not flow over into other articles.
- Most of all have fun editing - thats the reason we all do this right?!
|
|
The Camelford water contamination incident - sometimes known as the Lowermoor incident - has been controversial for twenty years. New health evidence, and new insight into the motives of the various organisations involved, is still coming to light. I think that we should have a big separate article on it. It needs to be written with care, because it is still controversial. However, I don't think that I have the energy to author it from scratch at this time, starting with reading the 200 pages of the latest government enquiry. All power to anyone who does! Emrys2 08:00, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
