User talk:Cascadia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to the Talk Page for Cascadia. Feel free to leave me a message or comment. Replies will be returned ASAP. Please feel free to comment about my contributions, etc. Please remember to Assume Good Faith and commit No Personal Attacks, as these will be PROMPTLY removed.

Archives /archive3-07 /archive3-07B

Contents 1 A thank you 2 My age 3 ok then 4 USRD Newsletter - Issue 4 5 Your message 6 RE:Threat on user page 7 Smile!

[edit] A thank you

Just a quick thank you for your wonderful work on policy! I thought I might invite you to look over the little project I was working on while you drafted better policy. Wikipedia:RfC/User names/Institutional memory has a section focusing on various decisions made regarding religion and religiosity. Best, Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 17:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Do you have any idea why there are so many strong reactions to the concept of "precedence" here? I have been curious for a while. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 20:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I think it has a lot to do with people wanting to change things on the fly... they feel that concepts like "Precedence" sound too much like lawyer terms. I really don't think some people fully understand the concept. If a decision against user X is made, and user Y does the same thing, precedence states that user Y should also have a decision against... its just a concept of fairness. But too many people here would rather have the authority to decide against user X and for user Y, thinking that "Oh, these are 'unrelated' although exactly the same, so we just come up with whatever fits the emotion of the time". A community without rules and precedence in decision, is a community in chaos. The faster people realize this, the better. Thanks for your help in creating the rule of precedence. Cascadia^TALK|HISTORY 20:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Ah...but let us not call it that. I would rather focus on what we need to do to continue developing an equitable and transparent approach on these matters. I found myself becoming inconsistent along with the crowd the other day. This sorta spooked me, so I adjusted my approach to look over the case history. Thus the new page in the project. I find that even those who say they don't believe in precedence here are for clarity in following history and historical decisions, while making their new judgments. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 20:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My age

Could you please keep my age a secret for now? Thanks. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 18:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion, but I'd rather not. This is because if I did I would have to go to the huge hassle of copieing and pasting. So I don't archive my talk page. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 18:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Again, thanks. But I'd rather not. You see, I rather keep, well, track of all of my comments on one page, rather than going through the hassle of click, click, click, and so on. So, I'm sorry to decline your offer. I hope you understand. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 21:31, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

You can contact me on talk page or on Monday, Wednesday, or Friday give me a ping on the IRC after 3:30pmish, on Tuesday and Thursday 5:20pmish and in the morning (and possibly afternoon) on weekends. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 21:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

One of the reasons I turned you down was that I thought it be too much work for you. Thanks. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 18:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Another reason was that I don't want my talk page archived, I want it all on one page. Thanks. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 18:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I see your point, but I still have to turn you down, well, because I just don't want to click constantly, and plus I think it is better to have one talk page rather than like 5. Thanks for understanding. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 21:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ok then

i will

[edit] USRD Newsletter - Issue 4

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 4	24 March 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project news March 16 IRC Meeting Deletion debates Kentucky and Utah projects demoted Featured subproject A quick look at the structural integrity of state highway WikiProjects Featured member From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. — V60 ^{VTalk · VDemolitions} 22:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your message

You're probably right about where I made the request, but I was in a bit of a hurry. Anyway, thanks for cutting down the code. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 16:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE:Threat on user page

I'm not going to remove it, this is a wiki and you are telling me to do, which violates everybody's equal rights. Plus, user:Jakerl copied my entire userbox section (but that was removed). - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 20:52, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

You're requesting, yes, and I am requesting too. Thanks. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 21:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but WP:AGF isn't really important in this matter. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 21:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Like i said above, WP:AGF isn't really important. It is just WP policy. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 21:40, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

In this matter WP:AGF doesn't mean much, in other matters it might, but not in this one. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 21:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I was upset because it was my work, and that he probably didn't live where i lived. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 21:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

It's my work, but I release to be used on Wikipedia. I get it now. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 22:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Great. I love userboxes. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)|HISTORY} 22:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Smile!