Talk:Croatia in the first Yugoslavia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] NPOV

This article is in great danger of breaking Wikipedia's "Neutral Point Of View" policy. For example: " Montenegro lost its independence in 1918 after being brutally annexed to Serbia. The independence of Montenegro was regained in 1945 within the Tito's Yugoslavia." or "It resulted in unbearable terror and persecutions of Croatian peasants and intellectuals." both clearly show that this article is not being kept up to standards.

I think its a great article with a lot of relevant info, but it has a lot of bias in its roots. Again, a paragraph starts off with "Croatian scientists were also victims of the Serbian terror." I can't really see this not being called biased.

Liet 20:19, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

The problematic sentences and paragraphs was inserted by User:Vincit omnia veritas in January 2006 (diff). Thuresson 20:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New tags added.

I added some new tags to the article. First the article lacks sources for its statements, including very specific "facts" that must be cited. Second the article clearly relies a great on the opinion and personal research of an editor, which is reflected it the uncompromising and very POV tone of most sections. Also the last section on the Ustasha clearly uses a weasel word formation to make the rise of this fascist organization was simply the result of, according the the author the flawed politics, of the Yugoslav Kingdom. This article now is in no way a reliable source of information and should be presented as such until it is improved, mainly by removing POV language and uncited facts or providing reliable (preferably English-language) sources to support these facts. --84.153.14.4 16:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)