User talk:Dr Debug

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Randroide 2 Reporting a user 3 Your comment solicited 4 And here we go again...

Messages Please add new discussions by clicking here. Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Boot Camp. I will reply to messages left here below your comment, not on your talk page unless specifically specified otherwise. Flame wars will be archived or moved. I don't feel like keeping them around either. Archive 1 (msg 1-43) Archive 2 (msg 44-76) Archive 3 (msg 77-143)

[edit] Randroide

Oh, yeah. Still busy.

It is the never ending history, an spanish JFK.

Happy new year, Dr Debug. Randroide 21:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reporting a user

hey dude, can you help me? I want to report a user who is vandalising The Offspring article by changing it's genre and backing himself up with a non reliable source. This user refuses to discuss in talk the genre and keeps editing. The user is Deathrocker. How do I report him? --Dexter prog 17:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your comment solicited

Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/BenBurch

Thanks!

Thanks! The matter resolved quickly. --BenBurch 09:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] And here we go again...

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#2004_Madrid_train_bombings.

I thought you could be interested.

Cheers. Randroide 20:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Replied on User_talk:Randroide

Hi, Dr. Debug. Arbitration has been ejected. Thank you for showing up at the RfA. Now we are going to a RfC. This is the link if you want to participate: Talk:2004_Madrid_train_bombings#Arbitration_rejected.

Just in case you did not know: Remains from the explosions in the trains were finally teste by the Spanish police (in february 2007!!!). Result: There´s Dinitrotoluene, Goma 2-ECO (the "official" explosive) has NO Dinitrotoluene. The official version is bogus. Randroide 18:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the linkk, Dr. Debug. Frankly, I have enough keeping mainstream "uncomfortable" data into the article. OTOH, I do not think reasonable that the CIA had any part in the Madrid bombings: The bombings weakened the coalition leaded by the USA.

Could you please take a look at Talk:2004 Madrid train bombings from time to time?. Our blanking friends are pressing to delete or relegate even well sourced (uncomfortable) facts. Thank you, again, for the link. Randroide 08:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Uhmmmm, you are making me think... did you know about Brandon Mayfield?.

It was identified by the FBI, and there´s a decades old feud among CIA and FBI.

But what´s would be the benefit of the CIA with the Madrid bombings?. It makes no sense for me, really. Randroide 12:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

But, what´s the purpose?. The Madrid attack removed Spain from Irak. Sorry, but it makes no sense. You found a possibility for the "how", but not for the "why".

Plase take a look at Talk:2004_Madrid_train_bombings#Undue_weight_in_opening_paragraphs, the memory holers strike back, and WE need all our X-Wings to defend our position. Check the sources to be relegated (some of them are in English) to the memory hole. You will find some interesting additions:

• The guys who provided the explosives were drug merchants AND police confidents.

• The police knew about them and they were under surveillance since, at least, 12 months earlier.

Cheers Randroide 19:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)