Talk:Earl Doherty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
[edit] POV
This statement is pure POV: "Currently, the position that Jesus never existed is a minority position among scholars and Doherty's arguments have not made a very strong impression on the consensus [1] among the Western scholars. ..."
What does majority rule have to do with truth? Or that there was no historical proof of “Jesus”? - Sparky 17:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed! It's not like historians know anything, right?
- Please. Every basic statement of history is going to be disputed by someone; people are contrary. But if the majority of relevant scholars on a topic aren't considered to be worthwhile for citation, then we may as well write off all history on Wikipedia at once. Because that's the only way that we're really going to get historical positions, without original research. -Senori 22:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)