Talk:Aphrodite's Child
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
 |
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. |
I undertook editing and revision of this article. The original author was certainly enthusiastic enough about the group but there were unfortunately several flaws in his approach. I hope I have maintained the spirit of the original while bringing it in line with encyclopedia standards. - Happydog
[edit] Mercury or Polydor?
Discussing the delayed release of 666, this page states "Mercury finally agreed to release 666 two years after its completion, and it came out in 1972."
On the same subject Irene Papas says "the album being withheld from release for two years by Polydor Records."
Which is correct? Mercury Records or Polydor? One or other page should be corrected. --David Edgar 16:47, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- At the time of her involvement with 666, Irene Papas was signed to Polydor Records in Italy and may have got confused. The record company was definitely Mercury.
[edit] Defining example of the concept album?
I would like to question the phrase "in time the album became recognized as one of the most important early progressive rock works, and a defining example of the concept album." In the article about Concept albums neither the group or this album is mentioned, nor in the article about Progressive rock. As i can tell, there have been several concept albums before this, even in the decade before this album. And as this album was released in 1972, it cannot have been "one of the most important early progressive rock works." In my view, progressive rock was very much defined by 1972. Had it been released in 1970 the story might have been different. --Sverre M. Vikan 23:09, 13 May 2006 (EST)
- As someone who remembers those times with great affection, looking back on the whole progressive rock movement from this distance, I would say that 666, as well as being great music and a bold statement, certainly sits well with the descriptions of prog rock and concept albums at the popular evaluation, but its lack of commercial success, and its relatively late arrival on the prog rock scene, probably mitigates against it being regarded as "important," "defining example" etc. But hey, it's still great music, so just put it on and enjoy!
[edit] rewrite
I've radically rewritten this entry. The old version paid too much attention to the band's last album (70% of the entry) almost ignoring everything else. Therefore, I moved the information for their last album to 666 (album), expanded the section of their first two albums (which was previously squeezed into a tiny paragraph) and also expanded the discography.
- Nice work! I was going to do this myself but you beat me to it!
