User talk:Kostisl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Kostisl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
And don't forget, the edit summary is your friend. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 13:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
I want to tell you the links I proposed are well-researched, very thorough, contains no hate and would be an asset to Wikipedia. My question: did you read them before removing? Try that short one: http://www.geocities.com/b_d_muller/index.html , an introduction for my many pages. Note: that site has been posted as a link, for a long time (please don't remove it!) on Wikipedia pages about 'historical Jesus', 'historicity of Jesus' and 'Jesus myth'. Maybe I am not a registered scholar, but I thought Wikipedia was not all about propagating the work of professionals. I consider myself more of a critical & investigative amateur historian, with burning (but not blinding) passion about the history of very early Christianity. And my approach (and background) should be commanded in a field "controlled" by many scholars (most of them on a payroll) with very different opinions & theories (which would prove that scholarly works, in this specific field, may be the problem, not the solution). I must admit I am very annoyed when my pages are rejected, mainly because some existing links are of bad quality, very biased or totally irrelevant (Check the last link on the 'Ignatius of Antioch' page --'Ignatius of Nerdtreehouse'). (BTW, I would love to attract your attention on these bad links, after reviewing them, of course). I did participate about one year ago into editing the 'Jesus' page. But that was very discouraging, with my work being often chopped down by evangelical Christians, even after some very long discussions. Doing so, I declared my own name (as I do on my website, with my personal email) and I had my own Wikipedia ID (which I forgot). I hope to be in contact with you. Please note I can have my sites posted by someone else (in compliance with Wikipedia policy) and my webpages are ad-free. Bernard Muller, mullerb@shaw.ca
(above text posted anonymously by 68.145.170.106 on User page and moved here by Velela 13:08, 20 October 2006 (UTC))
Hi Kostisl. The above text was defacing your user page. I restored your user-page and move the text here. I have no knowledge of its purpose or meaning, it was just wrecking your user page. If it means nothing to you, then I suggest you revert this whole correspondence. Velela 13:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Patriarchate copyrights
You asserted on this el:Image:PopeEcumenicalPatriarch.jpg description that the Patriarchate is granting free use of its images with attribution. Can you please point me to your source of this information on their policy? Thanks.--Pharos 22:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- The site is still around, but they've moved it to www.ecupatriarchate.org. Can you please point to the section where they allow free use with attribution? Thanks.--Pharos 01:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I ran out of ideas so I've sent them an e-mail enquiring about the status of the photos.--Pharos 06:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've received no reply to the e-mail, so I'm listing this at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. You can see my reasoning there. Thanks.--Pharos 00:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I ran out of ideas so I've sent them an e-mail enquiring about the status of the photos.--Pharos 06:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I wanted to develop a Lossky page in Greek
For Niko Lossky and his son Vladimir. LoveMonkey 21:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Zee, appropriate and politically correct way of asking would be are ya slavic son, my response would nah. Are you orthodox?
PS Let me know what you need. I can scan and email!
??? What does nah mean in Greek??? LoveMonkey 03:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Well OK! Hey anyway I would like to an article on Plato's metaxy as well. But the Lossky would work real well for right now. Theokotos Blessings Always. LoveMonkey 19:58, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Awe ya! It's gorgeous, you da man!. Now if you could get Niko Lossky's page and or Soloviev's yep yep...But I am just satified with the the Vlad page. LoveMonkey 16:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey can I give you one of these.. award LoveMonkey 16:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Award
This is a barnstar award for your contribution in inserting a huge number of interwikis from the Greek Wikipedia (Βικιπαίδεια) both in articles and in categories. This award is replicated in the Greek wikipedia, under my role of user of both language versions and strong supporter of Operation Interwiki.--FocalPoint 20:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
