Talk:Permutation (policy debate)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article needs some serious clarification Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 18:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Right now this reads like a lectrure or article on debating the perm. It makes normative claims about what debaters should do instead of positive claims about debate. It should get cleaned up to fit with in Wikipedia's quality standards
[edit] Jargon?
I was looking at this article and made some fixes with grammatical confusion (possessive versus plural) and fixed some normative statements. When thinking about style, I was wondering if using shortcuts ie: "neg", "aff", "disad", etc. was appropriate, or if it would be considered "unencyclopedic". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bluecarrot16 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC).
