User talk:Pinball22
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Please note that I will reply here to comments left here unless you specifically ask otherwise. Thanks! |
|
|
[edit] 11:11
Hello there. Thanks for participating in this discussion. I posted a reply to your input on the discussion page, and was hoping that you might read it over and respond. thanks again. TheRingess 17:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- You were brilliant in there, Pinball. You "get" this wikipedia thing. I really enjoyed reading what you wrote and I'm glad the discussion went off on a tangent like that, it really stripped things down to some basic questions about what we're doing here. I have to give credit to TheRingess tho, he was equally brilliant and it was a stimulating debate! It reminded me of playing that game Phoenix Wright and TheRingess was playing the Edgeworth role. Well... I hope they keep the article! -- GIR 05:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] re: My re-creation of Trek Thunder Kelly...
Way cool. Thanks for contributing to the 'pedia. :) --Fang Aili talk 20:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Don't worry about the other one
Don't worry about the other one- when I saw your message I did it myself. Only administrators can delete the resulting redirect that the Move Page function leaves on the userpage, so I did it for you. Keep up the good work :-) --Deskana (For Great Justice!) 20:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RE:5.6.7.8
Fair enough, I apologise for the error. Sadly, those of us who are regular newpage patrollers see thousands of music and band-related articles every day, most of which are junk or self-publicity; thus, occasionally we make mistakes and a good article gets accidentally tagged for deletion (or vice versa, a bad one slips through the net). Walton monarchist89 19:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bill Griggs article
I read the 'like a resume' tag. I don't have a conflict of interest and I the information I wrote is supported by/cited in the sites listed in external links. Can you suggest what should be done to make it less resume-like? Is it the information itself or is it the words/tone?
-Scratchdawg 15:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's more the tone/style -- it's not terrible, just needs some work. The big thing that makes it jump out as having a problem is the lack of an introduction; check out the guide to layout for some suggestions about how to make a good intro. Without an opening paragraph that lets the reader know who we're talking about and why he's notable, it reads like a resume in that it's just a list of things about his life and accomplishments. Feel free to remove the tag once you've added an introduction, and just let me know if you need any help. Thanks for contributing to the Wikipedia! :) -- Pinball22 15:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- I added an introduction which I consider neutral. I removed the tag but if you feel it still needs to be there I guess just add it again.
- That looks good. Thanks! Pinball22 19:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- I added an introduction which I consider neutral. I removed the tag but if you feel it still needs to be there I guess just add it again.
[edit] History of fire safety legislation in the United Kingdom
Thanks for the move and typos.... must have gone blind reading it so many times to check it Geotek 17:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- No problem... nicely researched article, BTW. :) Pinball22 17:37, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Boki Bean
I agree that the Boki Bean article is probably a hoax -- I didn't find any information about anything named that on Google, or anything relevant about anyone named Gregor Handel. However, being a hoax is not one of the criteria for speedy deletion -- see WP:HOAX for more information about why. I've replaced the speedy tax with a hoax tag and a proposed deletion. Just a minor procedural thing, but I wanted to let you know why I changed it. Pinball22 19:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Pinball...appreciate the advice on the proper way of handling. Have a great day. Shoessss 19:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] re: Responsding to watchlist tag
Hello Pinball22. I apologize for posting a self promotion. I'm new.
-- User:Annodyne 05:55, 2 March 2007(UTC)
[edit] Speedies
Thanks :) And thanks for flagging the whole Luprach mess. NawlinWiki 17:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] esssccusss me!
look, omg you dont be trippin! boy, ima gonna smack you! uhhh omg when do you have the right to come up in hea and cause some wack boy. boy ma mamma, ma babiii's mama and my babii's ho's mama wou smack you boy! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.83.28.41 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Vibrants
Thanks, man. Zweifel 21:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. :) Pinball22 21:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reverting vandalism
Thanks for your efforts in tackling vandalism. However, it's sometimes easy to accidentally revert one anon edit to the previous version which also contains vandalism – in such cases it is necessary to revert to two or more anon edits to an earlier version. See ElgooG history (2007-03-05) for an example where you missed this! :-) MightyWarrior 17:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Whoops, you're right, I did miss one there! Sorry about that. :) Pinball22 20:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thank you for the assistance you provided at User talk:Bart Versieck. I sincerely appreciate it. Postoak 02:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Glad I could help. :) Pinball22 12:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Check out User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me. User:Bart Versieck either doesn't get it or simply could care less what you've told him. Amazing. Postoak 12:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm increasingly unsure about whether he isn't understanding what I'm saying or is actually deliberately ignoring it... I thought my second comment on the subject was extremely clear and direct, but obviously it hasn't made an impression. I'll try again to get through to him. Pinball22 17:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Check out User talk:Can't sleep, clown will eat me. User:Bart Versieck either doesn't get it or simply could care less what you've told him. Amazing. Postoak 12:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Its/it's...
I wasn't 100% - looks like I was wrong! It does look right with the apostrophe though! SFC9394 17:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
