User talk:Raul654/Wikipedia the Movie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page was nominated for deletion on 2007-03-27. The result of the discussion was No consensus, default to keep.

Would the outtakes be called m:bash? ;-) Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 14:54, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Waiting for the next episode. --Bhadani 17:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Page is a fine example of NPO. However, it lacks references and is based on conjectures and wild imagination. I am sure that the next episode shall be better one, with a new cast and crew. Let us pray that the page becomes a FP, that is, a Featured Page, shortly to be initiated by a bunch of imaginative wikipedians. --Bhadani 17:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

The articles gone, I just saved and all there is is my edit what is going on?

†he Bread 05:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Harassment

This page has some statements made to ridicule a former Wikipedian, albeit (s)he is banned. My attempts to remove this childish nonsense were reverted by someone who already had a previous dispute with me. I can't be bothered to deal with this right now, but this needs to go and I will probably return later to finish this off.--Konstable 06:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

I do not agree with your claim that NPA prevents us from making light of proven vandals. Raul654 06:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

This is a bit more than "making light". I see nothing funny about ridiculig little girls. She has over 1000 good edits in case you were not aware, so I hardly see how a blanket "vandal" tag applies. I know a couple of users who have been in trouble for vandalism, they are still here and editing, heck even those who have been indefinitely banned sometimes come back and edit peacefully - WP:NPA still applies to them, and WP:NPA applies to Cute 1 4 u. I see no exceptions on the policy page.--Konstable 07:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

If you want to remove all personal attacks on this page, you may want to quickly scan WP:BJAODN for personal attacks and liable statements. Your taking a page created for humor way too seriously. Notice at top of the page states: It is not intended, nor should it be used, for any research or serious use. None of this is legit and your reverting is inappropriate. — Moe 17:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

And another quick question would be what exactly is the personal attack your trying to remove because you stated it was "ridiculig [sic] little girls", which I don't see that, or maybe I missed the attack upon little girls. If you saying that "User:Cute 1 4 u is a vandal" is a personal attack, maybe Willy on Wheels should be offended by the former long term abuse section we had on him. — Moe 17:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

I think there is a difference between a 12 year old girl and somebody running multiple vandal bots. You know like age, maturity, and culpability. Anyhow, adults mocking a pre-teen girl, reflects more on themselves than their target. It actually comes across as quite pathetic. And you seem to have taken a a tip from kizzle's guide. — MichaelLinnear 01:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

I disagree with your personal attack in calling me a dick. Once again, I don't see the attack upon "little girls", there is no attack. The only reason you think it's an attack upon little girls is because Cute 1 4 u's account was actually controlled by a pre-teen, had you not known that, you wouldn't think there was a 'personal attack on little girls' at all because all Cute 1 4 u would be is a indefblocked user. — Moe 06:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

A famous character called Austin Powers once said to someone with a mole on his face, "Moooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooole... Nice to mole you...meet you! Nice to meet you, Mole!" B.t.w. was she a Fembot because we could probably integrate that with the Austin Powers thingy--CyclePat 04:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)