Talk:White Poppy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article, and Remembrance Day (at least) have similar or identical sentences referring to this organization, which is not linked to its own article. Further, Google returns only 32 hits. I suggest this organization is not notable enough for a mention here or in Remembrance Day. It was added by darrelljon (talk • contribs • count) as can be seen here I suggest a cite, or failing that, a removal. ++Lar: t/c 14:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- If PAGI are sufficiently notable, should White Poppy article be moved to Alternative Poppies article?--Darrelljon 19:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- I'd prefer if PAGI set up their own black poppy page and explain its relevance. The white poppy has some history and national (international?) importance --scruss 22:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- As well, there's now some controversy in Alberta, Canada; pacifist groups are selling white poppies there, and it has the Legion rather upset, especially in the leadup to Remembrance Day. --SigPig \SEND - OVER 04:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- That's because the white poppy is an afront to those who served and those that supported them, the sheer pretention is that the white poppy represents people who do "not to support any kind of war." including that of UN peace missions and defending allies... The fact that in Canada the poppy is owned by the Canadian government and allowed to be used only by the Royal Canadian Legion. Further that the people behind the white poppy steal the money that is used by the distribution of the scarlet poppy to support war vets who are unable to support themselves makes the entire thing even more despicable. 68.146.214.11 23:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
