Talk:Gluteal muscles
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This needs serious work Mattopaedia 03:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- I have copyedit'd the page, I think it now just needs referencing properly. Kcordina 12:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for all your work. It lacks in anatomical detail and clinical evidence. I've fixed it, though Mattopaedia 14:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
I feel better now. Mattopaedia 14:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Top stuff. It could just do with the formatting fixing - but I can't work out how to get the infobox's to appear one above another - at the moment they appear side-by-side leading to a very odd appearance. Kcordina 15:01, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- Yeah, I tinkered with it for a while, but gave up in the end because it was 0100 and I was meant to be studying. Maybe lines between each? Mattopaedia 00:00, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gluteal Muscles
- message moved from User talk:Arcadian
Hi, I notice you've taken the info-box's out of the Gluteal muscles page. Was that simply because they weren't formatting correctly? Or some other reason? There was a lot of good information in the boxes so it would be good to retain them, if the formatting can be fixed (which I'm sure it can be given a bit of time). Kcordina 13:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- Those boxes aren't gone; they've just been moved back to gluteus maximus, gluteus minimus and gluteus medius, where they had been before User:4micah did his merger back in December. However, if you want to find a way to include that information both on gluteal muscles and on the subpages, I'd have no objection. --Arcadian 15:26, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
- No, that's fine - they work better on the individual pages, I just wasn't being observant. Kcordina 09:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "Massaging the Gluts is necessary?"
Isn't the massage section a bit overstated? Could we have a link to support the necessity of massaging the gluts?
I agree completly, it has no references and sounds like an ad for massage services that need to be long and frequent to have any good. It makes me wonder who put it there and what they do for a living. Elcarmean 22:37, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Interwiki
There seemed to be a problem with interwikis, because they were about gluteus maximus only. I removed them and added them where they belong. --83.208.83.66 15:56, 15 September 2006 (UTC), Bodlina, from Czech wikipedia
