Talk:Henry More
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
The proposed merger of spissitude into Henry More seems inadvisable, because even if it's a small article, spissitude reasonably comes up in other articles where More is not directly mentioned, as with fourth dimension. --Kaz 20:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
I don't see any advantage to merging. If that is a genuine geometric term, why should it be merged into somebody's biography? Makes no sense.Dfass 00:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, if it were a genuine geometric term, you'd be right. But it isn't; that's precisely the point. It never caught on. So it doesn't deserve an article of its own, as though it were legitimate, current terminology. But a mention of it in Henry More's bio could be of some interest, and a redirect to that bio would do two things at once: Direct the reader to where relevant information can be found, and put it in context (a term proposed by Henry More, that never caught on). --Trovatore 01:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
