Talk:History of Saxony
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] PICTURES!!!!!!!!
- 1. This article needs more pictures!!! Then it would be super dooper awesome!
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.92.15.78 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- 2. Changed to "This article needs more pictures!!! Then it would be super dee dooperly awesome!" by:[1]
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.24.229.90 (talk • contribs) Revision as of 23:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- 3. -agreed! Pictures would be nice... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Angelmaraude (talk • contribs) Revision as of 06:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Needs more organization.
- Can hardly read+Information is scattered. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dongolov (talk • contribs) Revision as of 16:01, 29 October 2006 (Needs more organization.) (UTC)
__________________________________ CONCISE: The article is a handy little overview of Saxony; a guide to the future tidier article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kompass (talk • contribs) Revision as of 03:57, 7 December 2006 ('m Added comment defending this page'.) (UTC)
[edit] Motion to Split
| | |
- The problem with this article is first it's not getting edited[2]
- Secondly, geographic... the damn name started at the Rhine (see: description in Old Saxony--I've been looking for a good map of Germany to pin 'that' region down ever since!) and has gradually been drifting Eastwards until the current locale in Free State of Saxony/Kingdom of Saxony.
-
- A fair guess on that is a drift of 500 miles! (Boston to Pittburgh)
- A fair guess on that is a drift of 500 miles! (Boston to Pittburgh)
- Thirdly, political or historo-political concerns and topics are intricately blended with geographic due to the laws of inheritance in the old Holy Roman Empire and the later eventual German State.
- OTOH, as a survey article, it may have a place, but should focus then on the high points of the change and drift over time, their causes and effects, and leave the different geo-political coverages to the articles annoted already as main articles. Believe THAT is the best way to go. // FrankB 07:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
