Talk:ING Group
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is it just me, or almost this whole article about what the company did wrong? (Darkskul 19:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC))
- I agree. If the company was wise, they would send a representative to post here on the talk page. We need additional information and references to properly balance the article. They can wait for some editor to come along and do all that work, or they can facilitate the process by supplying information that we can verify and use. Jehochman (Talk/Contrib) 15:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Defamatory Material Removed
Today I had some free time, so I looked at the labor dispute section. There were no valid sources (a reference to the union's press release doesn't count). The material was highly POV and used inflammatory language. I therefore deleted the whole thing. Feel free to reconstruct that from scratch if you can find some reliable sources. Otherwise, the material doesn't belong in this article. Jehochman (Talk/Contrib) 16:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Neutrality disputed
Is the 'neutrality disputed' box still necessary? It seems to me (judging from a glance at the talk page and history) the dispute was related to the labor dispute and 'the wrongdoings'. IMHO this box should be removed. CjDMaX 20:20, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've tweaked the wording for the ethics investigations so that's more NPOV, and have detagged it, seems fine now. --Firien need help? 15:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
