Talk:Les Fusiliers Mont-Royal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (nations and regions): Canadian military history task force

[edit] Advertisement?

The last few lines or the last section in total seem to be just advertising the place IMO. Take out or is it relevant? Information about members and how to meet isn't relevant but it does make padd the article. --Guruparan 23:48, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

It's relevant info on the nature of the organisation. Also, it's not commercial advertising, since we're talking about a non profit organisation

I didn't say it was commercial advertising. And advertsing, no matter for who (non-profit or commercial) isn't accepted. But I at least think that the last line is irrelevant. I would hope so. --Guruparan 02:11, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Just a not to the Author. As a rule I prefer the term Québequois but in this instance, when you describe the recuits for WW2 as such, it is incorrect. At the time the french speaking people of Québec called themselves Italic textCanadien-FrançaisItalic text and very proudly. The term Québecois was an "invention" of the Italic textrévolution tranquilleItalic text of the 1960's to represent the supporters of an independant Québec versus the supporters of Canada. Furthermore; the term Italic textCanadien-FrançaisItalic textis not a negative one. It was taken up by the french of Québec at the beginning of the English occupation because the english-speaking inhabitants called themselves "English". Traditionnally the term Italic textCanadienItalic text was used in the French Regime to seperate the french born in new-france versus the "new arrivals" from france. Mogul58 16:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Pierre BrissonMogul58 16:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)