User talk:Librarianofages
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
[edit] Organic Expansion
I see you're new. Welcome. Let me know if there's any help you need, admin or otherwise. I'll be on the lookout for your "Organic Expansion" keep votes at my AfD's - lol! - CrazyRussian talk/email 03:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reliability of Google
I noticed an argument you were making on AfD recently about the reliability or lack thereof of Google hits. If you want to explain it further, I'd be very interested in hearing it. After all, anything which can make Wikipedia a better place is obviously a good thing, is it not? BigHaz 05:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orchard Hill Church
Just be careful with the rhetoric when responding to AfD nominations. Saying that someone doesn't "take deletion...seriously" is flying close to the wind where WP:NPA is concerned. BigHaz 04:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fight_Dem_Back
Hi, I was hoping you could further explain your vote on this AfD nom. Drett 14:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Jolly Roger
Dear sir
Re. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jolly Roger Restaurant, I am seeking consensus. Toward meeting your interests, the topic already exists in improved and in complete form, per Wikipedia standards, in context, at Lake City, Seattle, Washington#Storied past. The piece was chopped out by a newbie. The damage was soon repaired, and I've been trying to clean up this uprooted duplicate leftover. For Wikipedia quality, I would prefer disposing of this odd snippet, rather than leaving a scrap lying about. I am the original researcher and author of the topic in the article, post [1]. The Jolly Roger story is an integral part of the character of Lake City, but it is otherwise not particularly encyclopedic.
So toward consenus, would you change your vote? Thank you for your consideration. --GoDot 11:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC), (ed.) --19:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Dear sir
I am seeking consensus. Toward meeting your interests, have you any further concerns I might address? Please let me know. Otherwise, we are very close to consenus: Would you change your vote to delete? Thank you for your consideration. --GoDot 19:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
We are so very close to consenus. Toward that end, have you any concerns I might address? Please let me know. Would you change your vote to delete--or at least to neutral? Thank you for your response. --GoDot 16:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Role account
Hi, is this a role account? Arbusto 00:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- sorry, what is a role account? -- Librarianofages 01:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- I'm would hope that my user page would clearly demonstrate that this is not a "role account".. -- Librarianofages 01:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prof K E Viswanathan
Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/India. I am an inclusionist. I hardly vote for detele except when there are no sources. Please don't get angry (or annoyed) with me Doctor Bruno 03:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thats fine, I would just like to see more rigour in the arguments for deletion, I agree that some articles should not be kept at all -- Librarianofages 05:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkish Genocide in Peloponnese
Hi. I have asked an administrator to semi-protect the page in question. You can now have a look. I understand that POV is not a primarily good reason for deletion, because anything can be edited, but is this not a bit too much? It is not really an article, but rather a pamphlet - it will take a lot of editors a lot of time to improve that. Additionally, there is evidence that the text was scanned (Demosthehes, Behjamin, other "h"s standing for "ll", "turture" ..., ridiculous links), so OR and copyvio come to mind. I do not want to weigh on you, but could you reconsider in view of this? Thanks very much. --Pan Gerwazy 11:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- No longer necessary. The source of the text has been found, the article is a copy violation, and has been speedily deleted. Thanks for your attention, anyway. --Pan Gerwazy 13:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Darwin Awards needs an udate?
What about the Darwin Awards needs an update? I looked on the talk page, you didn't post anything there. Greg 23:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Worldwide MediaWorks
An article that you have been involved in editing, Worldwide MediaWorks, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide MediaWorks. Thank you. --A. B. (talk) 06:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Yanacocha needs an update?
You posted on the article for Minera Yanacocha that it is in need of an update, but didn't give reasons on the talk page...any reason why?--Kdesjardins 08:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- There is no update on the continuing court case from 2004. -- Librarianofages 12:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Schieven
Hi,
The article Schieven has all the information I could find. Tim Q. Wells 23:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] hey
heya. saw your comment on my page - did you mean me, or whynotanarchy? if the former... uhm, sorry but I dunno who you are, can you tell me? if the latter, yes, I agree :) -- infinity0 17:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- nothing specific, I have just seen a lot of your edits along with talk on different peoples pages which has led me to think that you are a nice guy =) -- Librarianofages 21:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Role account
Yes, I think Pointchair (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) is a role account.[2] Arbustoo 21:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
