User talk:Luna Santin/Archive 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User	Talk	Contribs	My Sandbox	Improve Me!

			This is my talk archive. I periodically move conversations here, to reduce clutter on my main talk page. If you'd like to continue or reference a conversation that's been archived, feel free to copy it into my talk or link to it, but please don't otherwise edit or remove it from this archive. Please don't leave messages for me, here, I can't guarantee I'll read them in a timely manner. Instead, use my main talk page. Thank you.
Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24 1 « 20 ‹ Archive 21 › 22 » 24

Deep Stealth Productions

I was actually reading over the speedy notice when the article was deleted; I was going to remove it because I felt the article *did* assert notability. An AfD, maybe, but it probably shouldn't have been speedied.--chris.lawson 05:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I don't think it's that big of a deal, just thought I'd let you know. I doubt the article would survive an AfD anyway, but if you do find any third-party sources (the article said something about involvement with the movie Transamerica?), hey, bonus.--chris.lawson 06:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Luna, make sure you note how Clawson is covering the footprints in the sand with his "anti-conspiracy" dust. --72.94.164.52 07:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Please see this sockpuppet case: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/WaffelWTC

Hello, I have seen your reverts to World Trade Center and know you as a good admin. I just opened the sockpuppet case on Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/WaffelWTC. I have to leave for an important appointment that will take me away from my computer for several hours. WaffelWTC, etal are vandalizing WTC with racial edits/blanking/pictures etc. I have reported the case but would appreciate if you would follow up for me. I am still somewhat the novice on submitting these sockpuppet cases. Thanks, Ronbo76 15:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

It was actually struck twice more after I wrote you. It took a while for the blocking admin to catch the other two. He closed out the case before those two were added/detected as the same attack type. Someone really has an agenda pushing the cat with a symbol on its head. Ronbo76 00:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

• user:71.162.76.148 did it twice;
• user:WTCGUY once

Thanks

hi I just want to say thanks for heling with that IP hopper I would give you a barn star but you said not to on your home page lolz and sorry for not answering that quick qustion sooner but I went off the internet to cool off :P ♥Eternal Pink-ready for love♥ 18:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, How are you doing? (I love entei 02:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC))

Welcome...

Welcome!!

Hello, Luna Santin, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some useful pages to help you get started:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy contributing as much as I do. When posting on discussion pages, please sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, or ask your question and place {{helpme}} on your talk page. You may also leave me a message on my discussion page.

I hope you enjoy this picture

Happy editing! I love entei 02:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Template:Songs

Thanks for adding the small option to the template. Could you also replace the image size (100px) with {{#ifeg:{{{small|}}}|yes|30|50}}px?— miketm - Queen WikiProject - 03:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Fulsome prison

I didn't know he was into cross-dressing erotic images :D. He really should be blocked as he's either impersonating, or he is, a banned user (not to mention asking female Wikipedians for such images). Will ^{(Speak to Me/Breathe)}_{(Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash)} 00:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't really think it is Homey, though (if it is, he's changed, as I've interacted with him in the past, and Zeq. I think I left a statement on his ArbCom case.). Damn, I miss the block button. Will ^{(Speak to Me/Breathe)}_{(Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash)} 00:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

At least he has taste, you must admit. --Elaragirl^Talk|Count 05:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, that was the 5th request for seminude images I'd received all day. It was starting to get tiring. – riana_dzasta 05:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Please update a protected template.

Greetings Luna. Since you've protected {{MultiLicenceWithCC-By-All-IntEng}} could you please replace the deleted image with Image:CC-logo.svg ? Happy editing. Valentinian ^{T / C} 13:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

thanks for protecting my page and all the sailor moon pages :} ♥Eternal Pink-ready for love♥ 22:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Untitled message

why is the atheism thing not NPOV ? belief in god or other supenatural phenomena is a belief that rests on shaky evidence; this is self obvious and npov. That it should need to be defended is clear evidence of the unwillingness of the god people to be neutral; they start with the assumption that atheism is somehow aberrent, as, apparenlty, do you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cinnamon colbert (talk • contribs) 25 February 2007.

reply - exactly. It is not contestable that there is no evidence for supernatural phenomena. That is why they are supernatural. Thus, the assertion I made is a strict logical inference from this, and, as such, it is up to you to say why the logical, scientific view - god does not exist and atheism is there fore a natural logical state - is not correct. I think you, like most atheists, are scared of them (for good reason to, look at Salman Rushdie) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cinnamon colbert (talk • contribs) 25 February 2007.

not saying it is the best - saying, (1) there is not one, repeat NOT ONE piece of evidence that god exists; (2) therefore, belief in god is alogical, and atheism should be the logical default state, just exactly as a belief that the moon is NOT made of green cheese is the logical default state, and people who believe otherwise need to justify themselves (In theUSA, at least in the 60s, it was common, for some strange reason, to tell young children that the moon was made of green cheese.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cinnamon colbert (talk • contribs) 25 February 2007.

no,no,no I don't argue the merits or demerits of anything; I merely ask why is precedence given to something for which there is no evidence. surely, you would not call it npov to say that people who believe in lunar green cheese are unusual ?

Why did you delete the article "antiwindows"

Why did you delete the article "antiwindows" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=antiwindows —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jonwikijonwiki (talk • contribs) 05:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC).

Funnily enough, I asked Luna to delete that article, it doesn't demonstrate a Neutral point of view, and is a borderline attack page. I suggest next time you write an article, you might like to take a read through our guide to Writing your first article. Take care, — Deon555^talk_desk^{sign here!} 06:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

re: your comments on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:208.57.149.253

That ain't right, man, to treat us this way and make assumptions. You block a range but can unblock a specific IP within that range -ours is fixed and does not change. we have done no wrong. now whenever someone here at the office visits your site, we get an unwarranted block message. it ain't right. we have accounts. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jacquese (talk • contribs) 26 February 2007.

antiwindows

I agree the article "antiwindows" was not for wikipedia I will be more carefull creating articles in the future. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.34.130.247 (talk) 02:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC).

3RR by anon on Armenian Genocide

I tried to submit a 3RR on user:85.99.64.9 who did more than 20 edits on that article. I think I screwed it up. Can you help me? Thanks, Morenooso 05:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I think I see it now on the bottom of the page. Too bad it not higher up in the instructions saying copy this and insert at bottom to complete report. Think I should tag the vandal with a level 4 template? That would make it easier for the block. Morenooso 05:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. You probably know way more than this humble padawan. Morenooso 05:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind me meddling with it, but I thought it would help to warn/explain him about Wikipedia not being censored, and I have placed a not-censored tag on the user's tp. As I expected, seeing his edits, the user is from Turkey, so I tried to explain how Wikipedia is still neutral in it. JackSparrow Ninja 06:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Possible username prob

Hi, I notice that you've acted as clerk in relation to this usurpation request: [1]. I'm concerned that the requested username may be incompatible with username policy which presently prohibits "Usernames mentioning or referring to illnesses, disabilities, or conditions". Ebola seems to qualify within that bracket. I wasn't sure where best to raise this question so thought I'd ask you. Do you think its worth having the name discussed at WP:RFCN? Thanks, WjBscribe 09:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I commented on the user:Diff problem now I think about it. You're quite right, Daniel.Bryant had the discussion at WT:CHU/U and linked the discussion the discussion from WP:RFCN. That's probably the best way to go here as well. Will you st it up or should I? I'm hesitant to do it because I know Essjay wants non-clerks to give WP:CHU and associated pages a wide berth. WjBscribe 09:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Makes sense, cheers :-). WjBscribe 09:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Talk: System of a Down

Thank-you for taking action on this page, it's much appreciated. --Seraphim Whipp 11:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi. The IP that has been vandalising the SOAD/SOAD talk is at it again.--Seraphim Whipp 22:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

This vandal

Did you say something about trying to get hold of AOL about the 81.blah vandal? He is still refusing to go away; if his ISP won't do anything, can we consider just blocking the whole IP range? He's breaking into the WikiProject now, and we really don't want that to be inaccessible to other IP users. Please let me know what you think. --Masamage 20:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

how long will my IP be blocked

re: your comments on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:208.57.149.253 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jacquese (talk • contribs) 00:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC). Is this permanent?

Hey thanks

Hey Luna Santin, I really appreciate you reverting the vandalism on my user-page! Illyria05 (Talk • Contributions) 06:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC) :)

Thanks

I just went to revert the vandalsim to my user page and found you beat me to it, thanks mate Jaxsonjo 09:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Apologies

Hi, my ip was recently blocked by wikipedia. I admit that my addition to "grain boundary" article did disrupt the language flow of the paragraph, and i am truly sorry about it. However, i believe that the piece of information was much needed. Again i apologise for my rashness and not discussing it before editing.

Will you unblock my range of IP address please?

Puah85 15:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC) eddie

Mahabali article under racist attacks

Hello.

Currently there are sers vandalizing the Mahabali article. Can you ensure that there is a neutral version rather than a version attacking Brahmins please? It keeps talking about "Brahminic Vaishnavites" infiltrating Kerala, India.

Thank you! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ag1roads (talk • contribs) 17:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC).

Unblock request

I mostly blocked for the blatant vandalism and now that you have brought up username block, I think you should have a look at this :P...¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 19:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• His article in case you're wondering how that's relevant :P: Roger Federer.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 19:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

request regarding Unblock

The request was also to look at Dab's behaviour. By unblocking me himself, he is trying to get around the system. He has been abusing admin powers. He has been publishing original research and removing properly referenced material. How do I go about getting this issue addressed properly. This has been escallated to mediation cabal before please see here [[2]] and I have already requested mediation today [[3]]. As an admin he should be upholding Wikipedia policies and not abusing them. Thanks.Sbhushan 20:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

User talk:65.39.114.238

No protest to this block, but I just wanted to leave you a friendly reminder that this user has not been warned since February 22, 2007. The t4 warning was issued six days ago, and who knows if the same person is vandalizing again. Keep up the good work. Nishkid64 20:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Nah, I'm fine with it. Just thought you wanted to know :D. Nishkid64 02:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Going to a library

Your comments on our discussion page suggest we go to a library or a friend's house to circumnavigate the block you put on our IP range. You put this massive block on to disrupt the vandals of spammers and the spam of vandals. But couldn't then those rogues take the same advice? And post their treason from libraries? You said it is too much work to un-block our valid,fixed IP from the blocked range. And you think it is not too much work for us to register from libraries. And yet you think it is too much work for cplot to do that. And you think all of this makes perfect sense and our appeal is not vaild. Do I have this right? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jacquese (talk • contribs) 21:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC).

Ugh

New users can't move articles, so I kinda had to copy-paste it, sorry. -Erfan24 06:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Editprotected edit request at Template talk:User5

Since you edit-protected {{User5}}, I should let you know I've requested an edit, at Template talk:User5, to add {{rfcu}} at the end for reference by Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets, where {{User5}} is extensively used. -- Ben 05:43, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

MagicKirin Sockpuppet

Hi Luna Santin. I'm 99.9% sure that Giza D is the latest of the Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of MagicKirin. Contributions include the usual: Cindy Sheehan, Hezboulah, Jimmy Carter. Edits have the same style.-- Zleitzen^(talk) 13:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

YAY ID HOPPING VANDLE BLOCKED

thanks for blocking his ISB (thingy) does that meen we can unprotec the sailor moon pages il help get them off but I wanted to ask you first ♥Eternal Pink-ready for love♥ 19:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Woohoo! Thank you! We love you! --Masamage 22:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandal revert

Thanks for the revert to my user page ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 20:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Same here, thanks. Dionyseus 22:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Yay You're Human!

Glad to see you're human Luna :P...I rarily see you mistakes therefore I had a theory in which you were a government robot prototype deployed onto an Encyclopedia website, whereby you would assume the identity of a certain Luna Santin and with a red herring proposal be given sysop rights by the community, after which they would send you as a sleeper cell to censor certain unwanted entries and you would extinguish any threats to those entries and by 2010 would launch a sting upon all of Wikipedia and send in droid armies to edit various pages and they would slowly start to replace all the administrators, then the government would gain its total control and cause its own database lock and thereby rendering anyone including Jimmy Wales from editing or entering the Wikipedia domain and all will be powerless...

Ok maybe I have too much of an imagination :P...¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

User.

Here: see this. Acalamari 22:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Luna Santin, what should be done about the request at the bottom of that page? Acalamari 00:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, I decided to review one of their requests for unblock. I declined it after all the edits they'd done, including vandalism to my user page. Acalamari 00:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanks for reverting my userpage and blocking that IP. They were leaving some weird messages on my talk page! Will (aka Wimt) 00:05, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Twinkle

Actually I looked into twinkle because I got accepted but they're having bugs, so I'm not added to the user list. RedSkunk^talk 00:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't see any of the functions. What does it look like? 신 RedSkunk^talk 00:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I have firefox, and I don't see any differences. Thanks for your time. RedSkunk^talk 00:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Doh... Thanks. Can you look at my editor review? Sorry to ask but am semi anxious. RedSkunk^talk 00:52, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Unblockmenow

Please restore user 67.167.130.247. this person did nothing wrong. He made MNAY contributions that were very useful and NEVER did vandalism. He does not want ot register because he does not have a home PC and he is not comfortable registering on a public computer. Yet, you censor for NO REASON of HIS DOING except charitable contribution. Please stop censoring many good people because a few with similar ip gateway do bad things. You judge me unfairly —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Unblockmenow (talk • contribs) 05:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC).

Cookie

Here is a chocolet chip cookie for geting rid of that IP hoping troll :} ♥Eternal Pink-ready for love♥ 16:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanks for getting the guy who was vandalising the Naruto pages. Although I was having fun reverting his creative additions. Retlor 22:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks! Can you block this guy? He's past his final warning. --Hojimachong^talk 22:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

User talk:SunStar Net

I fear this is going to require longer than 15 minutes of semiprotection; this has been going on for days. Sadly enough, see the history of Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians and its talkpage. Regards, Newyorkbrad 23:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

User:biochemnick

He refuses to discuss the matter and has repeatedly violated the 3RR while inserting information that clearly has a WP:COI. 208.255.229.66 00:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

User:Contra_Nazi

Hi Luna Santin. I saw that you blocked this user. As an admin on German Wikipedia I had some unpleasant experiences with one of the numerous sockpuppets of this guy, and quite frankly I don't like to be called an "automate nazi" on his discussion page. Is it possible to delete these slanderous remarks? Thanks and have a nice day. Stefan64 01:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 01:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}

get ried of the decland reson

the block has expierd ples get reaid of the decline teplite —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.222.107.129 (talk) 20:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC).

DJ Breaker

I created the DJ Breaker article and was not notified it was nominated for deletion. If the page requires more sources, I should be allowed to make the necessary changes prior to the deletion of the complete article. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Breakbackmountain (talk • contribs) 4 March 2007.

Why are you so strict?

why are you so strict I'm a good person. I just thought changing random things would be fun. I guess this site doesn't like it. Fine. Don't IP ban me! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.121.116.204 (talk) 5 March 2007

Happy Spread-the-funny and-slighty-random-love day!

Usurpation and username probs

Hi Luna, I noticed that Rdsmith4 rejected the Ebola usurpation request. I've asked him if the discussion at WT:CHU/U should be closed as a result. I've also noticed another one that I'm a little uncomfortable with- Death ← Death666. Both those names have the potential to make pople feel quite uncomfortable seeing them in sigs and logs everywhere. I thought it best to ask Rdsmith4 how he wants these matters dealt with in future now he seems to be the main crat dealing with the page. Oh, and looking at the above message, "Happy Spread-the-funny and-slighty-random-love day!" WjBscribe 13:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Richard Bennett/Network neutrality

I noticed you had a word with User:RichardBennett in his talk page before[4].

He's never really stopped, quite frankly he's been insulting everybody. According to him, everybody is a paid shill, every other edit apart from his own are vandalisms and everything anybody ever writes are scurrilous lies. Oh and apparently I'm paid by Google to write for the wikipedia. (See the history list here: [5]) The irony is that he really does stand to get money if Network neutrality gets buried- he's a well-known networking engineer.

If you could at least just have a word with him. His attitude, extremely marginal editing and extremely abrasive nature has kicked off a revert war between him and User:Calton in Network neutrality.

I've been trying to keep Network neutrality balanced, but his idea of balance appears to be 'show how network neutrality is really bad, and delete or reword anything that might make it look good'; I exaggerate, but not a lot. There's just no WP:NPOV; and his edit summaries are inexcusable in my view. WolfKeeper 00:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 10	5 March 2007	About the Signpost

New Yorker correction dogs arbitrator into departure	WikiWorld comic: "The Rutles"
News and notes: Picture of the Year, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Checkuser and Checkip

Daniel and I seem to have worked out the checkuser/checkip problems. (click to see) -- Ben 07:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)