Talk:Neosurrealism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Merge
I would be bold and do it myself, but neither of these articles makes enough sense for this layperson to understand how to do it. — AKADriver ☎ 18:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
I disagree. It's a totally new thing, and since there are not many new-born forms of art, it should stay seperate. It just needs to get expanded. greekalien 13:32, 24 October 2006 (GMT+2)
These two articles do not nearly reflect what Neosurrealism is. The neo-surrealist one has to be removed completely. --74.102.208.209 18:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
I know what the author of this page is on about, it's certainly a trend that's happening. However, he's fuzzy on boundaries and doesn't define it at all well - he's certainly no art scholar. He also aggrandizes by trying to claim all sorts of lineages and spurious philisophical ancestors. This page needs a big clean up and better focus. 23:18, 03 Feb 2007 (UTC)
