Talk:Onmyōdō
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
While this article is pretty in-depth about the history of Onmyodo, it might be nice if it goes into more detail about the actual practices.
there is a separate article on onmyoji... should they be merged?
- merged them
Note: The above two messages were added by User:Niz at 12:14, 21 June 2005 and 14:32, 23 June 2005 respectively, but were not signed. —Typhlosion 21:13, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
I made some grammatical changes to the Development section of the article, but I am afraid I may have changed its meaning. Someone who knows more should take a look at it and make sure it is still accurate. Caelarch 16:20, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- I just cleaned it up a little. Today, I learned something! --Bluejay Young 01:05, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Wether or Onmyodo is considered a pseudoscience is of no consequence. This article should be purely about Onmyodo, not what modern science thinks of it. -- User:Brian at 6:41,10 August 2006
- I disagree. The article is purely about Onmyodo currently. Firstly, stating that Onmyodo is pseudoscientific is a valuable way of putting the practice in a modern perspective, because it does demonstrably incorporate pseudoscience. Furthermore, the article is mostly made up of historical data translated from the equivalent Japanese article which, though in need of more specific sources, appears to be verifiable. Unless someone can define a specific conflicting viewpoint, I see no need for a POV dispute. Shiva Indis 07:20, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cultural References
I just added a tidbit of a footware company being named Onmyōdō and I can't quite decide if it's more culture or more advert. If it's believed that it falls into the latter, feel free to remove. --Thisisbossi 02:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
