Image talk:Pangaea continents.png
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
152.163.100.135 01:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)Personally i believe that the supercontient is a true theory but a couple days ago in my science class at my school we had a debate about whether or not this theory was mostly correct. this all started when our social studies teacher Mr.Bob* asked us a question, "What is Pangaea?" no one knew at all. So i came onto this webstie in search of info. that all of the people on this site were thinking as well as me, how would this happen over that well, short amount of time because what has been proven is that the plates move about one hundreth of a centimeter or less so after the debate which you can guess who won. I thought that maybe just maybe not all of the contients were attached and maybe one or two of them were undiscovered that might have become the reason why Anarctica got so large so i looked into it and the only explanaiton I could think of is Teabagz. If you don't believe me then try it yourself take a tea bag then put it in the refridgerator and take it out then put it in hot water trust me my science teacher even agreed that it was the only way to explain how Pangaea was formed other than the Ice Age, tusunamis and earthquakes there is no other way to explain the supercontinent
yours truly,Drea*
- =name has been changed
