Talk:Rapture debate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Standards to remember
Please try to incorporate the following Wikipedia standards: Verifiability, Cite_sources, No_original_research Jason Hommel 22:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Edit summary: Codex Sinaiticus (rv - how about some consensus first, RHaworth? Most of this crucial info was split from Rapture as a subarticle to save space; if you do this, it now appears nowhere).
- Fair enough but nowhere is that stated neither in the edit summaries nor on this talk page. -- RHaworth 14:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
None of the criticisms listed here are my own. About half of the aplogetics, I'm responsible for. The criticisms and apologetics were the worst part (mostly unsourced) of the rapture article, also not organized (not together). I put them here, yes, to save space, and to improve the rapture article. Many highly controversial topics have the debate/controversy pages separated out, and I have a feeling that this topic can grow very fast, especially now that it has its own page. -- Jason Hommel 18:33, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
