Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Otheus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Otheus
Suspected sock puppets
- Otheus (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- 60.242.13.87 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
Suspected master account and those mentioned in RFAR ruling as being related
- Agapetos angel (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Dennis Fuller (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Phloxophilos (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- 220.245.180.133 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
- 220.245.180.134 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
- 220.245.180.130 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
- 58.162.252.236 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
- 58.162.255.242 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
- 58.162.251.204 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
- 58.162.2.122 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log • checkip)
- Code Letter: B
Per Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Agapetos_angel#Agapetos_angel_et_al._banned "Agapetos angel and User:Dennis Fuller, User:Phloxophilos, User:220.245.180.133, User:220.245.180.134, User:220.245.180.130, User:58.162.252.236, User:58.162.255.242 and User:58.162.251.204 are banned from editing of Jonathan Sarfati and associated articles. This list is not exclusive and the remedy applies to any user, registered or not, who engages in the same type of tendentious editing as has been done by Agapetos angel."
Otheus and 60.242.13.87 are walking in Agapetos angel's footsteps in their edits at Jonathan Sarfati and have characteristically for Agapetos angel launched a series of personal attacks against the admins who have enforced the RFAR ruling in order to gain the upper hand in a content dispute at the Sarfati article. We suspect that the Otheus account and IP may be those named and banned by the ruling: User:Agapetos angel / User:Dennis Fuller / User:Phloxophilos / User:220.245.180.133 / User:220.245.180.134 / User:220.245.180.130 / User:58.162.252.236 / User:58.162.255.242 / User:58.162.251.204 / User:58.162.2.122
FeloniousMonk 05:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment
- by Otheus 19:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- In case lingering doubts exist after the checkuser, please consult an independent view.
Clerk note: Added mentioned usernames and IPs to list, above. Feel free to revert if that wasn't your intention. – Luna Santin (talk) 18:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Unnecessary The purpose of the remedy was to permit any user "walking in Agapetos angel's footsteps" to be blocked without further ado. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Would it change that decision to note that this RFCU could also be rated as a legitimate class F request? The filing occurred five minutes before a 48 hour block on the IP address User:60.242.13.87[1] that remained in force during most of the time the request was outstanding and the User:58.162.2.122 address has been under a monthlong block that began before this request opened and will remain in force until April 17.[2] A recent post from
OroborosOtheus indicates this editor wishes a checkuser in order to clear a cloud of suspicion.[3] My own sockpuppet investigation indicates virtual certainty that all IPs listed represent the same person and suggestsOroborosOtheus is not the IP vandal in question. The whole situation would be easier if a checkuser confirmed this as right or wrong. Legitimate doubts exist, which is why the complaint was filed. DurovaCharge! 02:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
