Talk:Romanization of Belarusian
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project’s quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project’s importance scale. |
 |
An entry from Romanization of Belarusian appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 15 February 2006. |
 |
[edit] Examples
The examples table needs one or two more words, to demonstrate the transliteration of the letters х and й, and perhaps with ю or я at the beginning and in the middle. —Michael Z. 2006-02-13 23:32 Z
[edit] isn't it: ROMANIANIZATION of Belarusian?
I think is write in this way to mention.
- Romanization means conversion to the Latin (Roman) alphabet. Romanianization, or Rumanization, is something else. —Michael Z. 2006-02-14 22:39 Z
Anonymous, I reverted your revert to an earlier version. My original edit summary covered the problems with table formatting, but I didn't mention some other problems: that the new location of note references changed the scope of the notes which applied specifically to Łacinka, and not to the Cyrillic letters in general, and that the table formatting made the main article headings pile up on the right side of the tables in my web browser (Safari/Mac). —Michael Z. 2006-02-14 22:51 Z
I don't understand the reason of the undeletion. The message I deleted wasn't based on any official info, was misleading and promotional. None of the other systems' entries carry a promotional message with them. This isn't a comparison of systems but an index. So why undeletion? Yury Tarasievich 21:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
