Talk:Semacode
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Don't know if the box to the right should be included? Bawolff 23:08, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
It should not. The Wikinews article relates to Semapedia, not to Semacode. Symbologist 12:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
I do not think that "Semacode" is relevant enough to justify an independent entry. If the entry is or will be removed, the content (sparse at is, anyway) could be put under Object hyperlinking. This is at least the place where the general idea of so called "semacodes" belongs to. Symbologist 12:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- There are 120,000 hits on Google for "Semacode". It deserves its own article. If it is sparse, add a stub tag. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 15:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Self-reference in image
The example image should just say "Semacode" or something — It shouldn't be a reference to Wikipedia. ~ Booya Bazooka 21:43, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wording
I just wanted to let everyone know that I changed "page" to "article" because I thought that there was a page on the semacode Website about Wikipedia, after which I realized it was just referring to the page I was on [it was inverse to what I originally thought.]
