Hello! I got this template from Lar, so not all of it will relate to me (as I'm only a few days old, Wikipedia-wise). This page has been mostly copied from this page.
So, here are some useful links:
[edit] Useful Links and Notes
[edit] Guides, References, and Examples
- Wikipedia:Tools/Navigation popups The popup page, popups are one of the greatest things since sliced bread
- User:Titoxd/Flcelloguy's Tool A good tool for evaluating contributions of candidates for things. needs clientside install
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-12-26/Wiki tools A shedful of good tools
- User:Trilobite/Tools Need to enhance my .js with this stuff... a BUNCH of good javascript stuff, like add a purge tab!!! (much already added)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts cool script stuff that needs looking at
- Interiot's contribution tree walker (already pointing to me)
- Interiot's edit counter (has distribution info, looks like based on Kate's tool) (already pointing to me)
- "wannabe-Kate" counter also by Interiot (already pointing to me), works even if the toolserver copy of the DB is down. Slow and resource intensive, run only if needed.
- User:Dragons flight/AFD summary for statistics geeks, policy wonks, Deletionist Scum, people with grudges against articles, and those noble, heroic or angelic inclusionists out there (all 3 of you), this tool is for you.
- User:Dragons flight/Category tracker for stats geeks as well... very cool stuff to track trends. Bots rule.
Here it is embedded, courtesy of User:Dragons flight. :-)
This is a bot-generated summary of the current candidates on requests for adminship.
When the bot is running this page will update about once an hour. The last update was 14:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC).
If this page does not update, a similar summary is available at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/RfA Report.
Open RFAs are ordered from oldest to most recent.
| 0-69% |
70-85% |
86-100% |
< 10 responses |
[edit] Adminship
|
Username |
S |
O |
N |
S % |
Ending |
| 1 |
ais523 |
63 |
0 |
1 |
100% |
17:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC) |
| 2 |
Anthony.bradbury |
100 |
1 |
0 |
99% |
23:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC) |
| 3 |
Xdamr |
39 |
0 |
0 |
100% |
00:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC) |
| 4 |
Earle Martin |
24 |
41 |
11 |
37% |
12:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC) |
| 5 |
PullToOpen |
42 |
0 |
1 |
100% |
23:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC) |
| 6 |
Anynobody |
11 |
15 |
8 |
42% |
02:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC) |
| 7 |
YechielMan |
18 |
10 |
4 |
64% |
06:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC) |
| 8 |
Akhilleus |
36 |
0 |
0 |
100% |
14:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC) |
| 9 |
JuJube |
27 |
0 |
1 |
100% |
00:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC) |
| 10 |
Wooyi |
2 |
10 |
2 |
17% |
01:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC) |
| 11 |
Cla68 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
100% |
12:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC) |
Recently concluded: Waggers, Acalamari
[edit] Bureaucratship
|
Username |
S |
O |
N |
S % |
Ending |
| 1 |
Majorly |
8 |
3 |
1 |
73% |
10:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Thought Provoking Essays and Neat Links
- User:CatherineMunro#Why am I here? CatherineMunro is an old hand. Her essay on what participation means to her is thought provoking and very well written. There's something in it for just about every conscientious editor.
- User:Geogre Geogre and I seem to be on the opposite side of just about everything we've both been involved in. But this is good stuff. The section dealing with how one should vote in AfDs is really well put, and the musings on article quality and why no article is better than an inadequate article seem very apt. I need to remember to reread these every so often.
- The Wikipedia Creed
- User:Essjay/Neutrality Not sure anyone could be that neutral but worth striving for!
- User:Essjay/Rules also thought provoking! Don't whinge, fix it yourself (something I could do to remember more often)
- User:Karmafist/wikiphilosophies a bit more "cynical" but pragmatic view of how stuff gets done...
- Meta:Academic standards disease this is a counterpoint to the stance I've been taking that experts should be shown deference or at least given the benefit of the doubt by default.
- User:Vaoverland Just an enjoyable read. Lots of little tidbits on how to be a better Wikipedian and interesting background facts about stuff he's worked on. I hope if I ever get as prolific as he is, that this page is half as good.
- User:Anthere/Values "For any article you vote to delete, vote one to keep, or improve one which is on the border of being thrown in the bin."
- Wikipedia:Xiong's stats Some fascinating analysis of number of edits/articles/sizes/growths and the correlations among them... not sure what it all means but it seems significant. For some reason. Or it may just be dazzling with numbers.
- DefendEachOther from MeatballWiki. Don't defend yourself. Let others do it for you, and in turn, defend them if need be.
- 2005 IBM study on the dynamics of Wikipedia, including article creation/improvement, social interaction, conflict resolution, et. al. with statistics and page history visualisations.
- blog about the same study.
- Five Geek Social Fallacies ... very applicable to here, believe it or not.
- On adminship by Splash from Durin's talk.
[edit] Bragging about various things
[edit] Articles I am proud of having had a hand in
[edit] Goofs because Lar can't spell
- User:Lar/Industrial_Archeology There is a perfectly fine Industrial Archaeology article out there which Lar missed... think Lar merged it all in now.
[edit] SuperSTUBS Lar is working on that might be articles some day
Bridges & related
Buildings
People
- George Gaylord (maybe.. not sure he's notable enough)
Sites
- User:Lar/Domai.com ... :If Aaron doesn't get to it first!
[edit] Images Lar have uploaded
(Some taken by Lar, some found, and since Lar's using special:contributions, some are just wording/license tweaks on images by others... should Lar build a gallery? Message Lar if you care one way or the other)
|
