Talk:Texas Eagle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| See also: WikiProject Trains to do list | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance within the Trains WikiProject. |
 |
This article is maintained by the Passenger trains task force. |
 |
This article needs a map. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article. Once the requested map is added, remove the Mapneeded parameter from the {{TrainsWikiProject}} template call on this page to remove this map request. |
While the 'White House confusion' section describing an exchange between a Texas constituent and vice-president Al Gore may be technically correct, this section seems totally out of context with regard to the page on the Texas Eagle train. I do not think that this section belongs in the article, but would not remove a factually correct (though essentially unrelated) paragraph based on my own bias. Do others feel that the Gore/Texas Eagle exchange rises to the level of being a useful part of the page, or should it be relegated to some political discussion page related to Al Gore? RI-Bill 05:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
'White House confusion' section renamed 'Political Hurdles' and edited to make more relevant to the Amtrak Texas Eagle.RI-Bill 18:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Response
The renamed "Political hurdles" section seems to exist only to describe an amusing response from from V.P. Al Gore's office, where he thinks the writer's mention of "Texas Eagle" refers to a bird. This is a joke at beast and crass political partisanism at worst - neither belongs in Wikipedia. Wikipedia should describe the politics, not fall victim to it. I suggest deleting this entire section, as there appears to be no "meat" here. --Harpwolf 23:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
The section probably focuses too much on the Al Gore letter, when it should mention TEMPO (Texas Eagle Marketing & Performance Organization) and the massive letter-writing campaign directed at many politicians and agencies. However, the 1997 controversy is a central part of the Texas Eagle tale and should remain. Mineola and Marshall, in particular, contributed a great deal to the eventual preservation of the route. The Al Gore letter, while humerous, did point out the lack of communication between the administration and Texas Eagle supporters.
[edit] Route
Shouldnt the route be listed all the way to Los Angeles California? John R G 06:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- Since the current timetable (PDF) shows operations through to LA, I would think so. {{sofixit}}. Slambo (Speak) 16:06, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Leave comments from the office of the Vice President
Then challenge folks to plan a trip using an AmTrak schedule and their vacation budget...good luck! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.54.155.51 (talk • contribs) 09:58, September 6, 2006.
