Talk:The New York Review of Books
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
HAHAHA I cannot believe the photo in the article! Seriously, doesn't anyone else think it's kinda inappropriate?
--Jlpspinto 01:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- It is really funny. But hey... it does indeed show various copies of The New York Review of Books, as claimed... and a cat... - Reaverdrop (talk/nl/w:s) 07:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Infobox
I'm not 100% sure the info i've provided is correct in this infobox. please add to it as i will endeavour to do so. Jpeob 10:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pretentious description
Does anyone else think..."which takes, as its point of departure that the discussion of important books is itself an indispensable literary activity...." is a bit pretentious particularly at the start of the article? --Tom 17:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Can the quip about the "amazing pettiness" of the letters be delted?
