User talk:Tragic Baboon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Poll finds people think Wikipedia "somewhat reliable"
- Wikipedia biographical errors attract more attention
- Association of Members' Advocates nominated for deletion
- Reference desk work leads to New York Times correction
- WikiWorld comic: "Charles Lane"
- News and notes: Alexa, Version 0.5, attribution poll
- Wikipedia in the news
- Features and admins
- Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Welcome!
User talk:Tragic Baboon/Archive
[edit] DYK
--Carabinieri 00:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for your help
Thanks for your help on the Guy Livingston article. It earned a DYK. I really appreciated it. Chris 01:17, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
--ALoan (Talk) 17:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Isaac Varian, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 00:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Larissa Tudor
I dispute that the article is "very badly written." It's well-referenced and it covers the subject matter appropriately.--Bookworm857158367 19:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
--Majorly (o rly?) 20:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please clarify
Please clarify what you meant when you wrote Keep on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Controversies_of_Chabad-Lubavitch. Do you mean to keep it as Controversies of Chabad-Lubavitch? Or only the Chabad Messianism section? --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 12:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Andrwsc
Thanks for fixing the links. It seems like it wasn't such a glory idea to start the RfA page under my userspace with the intention to move it to the "official" location when ready. I could swear it worked better last time I did this... Sigh. --Ligulem 23:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
It's been a week since my recent request for adminship passed, and since I haven't managed to delete the Main Page - yet - I figure it's safe to send these out. Thanks a lot for participating in my RfA; I hope to do a good job. If you see me doing something wrong, need help, or just want to have a chat, please don't hesitate to drop by :) – riana_dzasta 07:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dhinsa...
...now has his very own article. I'd still like to add more using the refs you emailed me (I can't get into my email from my work computer - stupid Websense) but it's a decent start for the time being. Thanks for your help. If you're going to do more with it, I figured you might as well get credit for your contribs to the main space instead of just in my sandbox. Kafziel Talk 21:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
--Carabinieri 11:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RfA thanks
Thank you for supporting my RfA. It was (47/0/0) upon closure and now phase I is complete. I think the tools will aid both me and the encyclopedia. Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, or if you think I'm misbehaving I'm always open to recall. Thanks, James086Talk 12:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chabad Messianism
Hi there, could you please help me out I don't know what to do. I am being chased around by User:PinchasC who will not let me add a single word or link about Michichism, let alone create a separate article.
Every time I try he pulls another deceitful slight of hand, reverting endlessly, nominating good articles for AfD just to confuse people and so on and so forth.
Chabad Messianism is one of the major controversies in Judaism in the past 50 years with numerous books on the subject yet PinchasC (and co) have ensured that there can only be 1 paragraph in all wikipedia about it - which is followed by endless of the point Berger-bashing.
He nominated Controversies of Chabad-Lubavitch for AfD to create a smokescreen, when there was a clear consensus expressed that there should be a Chabad Messianism article I un-redirected it. He then redirected back again, without any debate and falsely claimed that all the info was in the other article.
How can this be resolved?
David Spart 21:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
--ALoan (Talk) 12:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:SEC_seal.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:SEC_seal.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Thanks for your support on my RfA. It passed with 55/0/0. I'll try my best to be worthy of the trust the community has put in me. If there are any of my actions you have a problem with or a question about, please feel free to discuss this with me and if needed to revert me. If there is anything else I can help you with (backlogs, comments, ...), you can always contact me on my talk page. Fram 14:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)