User talk:Xavic69
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello there Xavic69, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. BTW, thanks for starting Gascon language. Cheers! --maveric149
Contents |
[edit] Question on the Sephirah article
Just a clarification... The Sephirah are the emanations of God, i.e. the nodes, and the Tree of Life is the whole thing, right? So the whole diagram (and concept) is not called "The Sephirah"?
The reason I ask is that I want to make sure a Tree of Life (Kabbala) article would not be redundant.
Thanks!
lunaverse 01:31, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Geometric algebra
Hello. You put a link to clausure in geometric algebra. I don't know what that word means, but it redirects to closure, which is (as you would probably expect) a disambiguation page. I've pointed it at closure (mathematics) after surmising that that's probably what you intended.
- closure (mathematics) was what I meant. I misspelt the word when translating it.
You're using too many Capital Letters. See my recent edits to that article and you'll see what I mean. Michael Hardy 20:32, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Talk:Tibet
Xavic69,
Please let me know what you think and if you agree on my comment on Talk:Tibet. If you do, would you be able to help me in changing User:Nathan Hill's edits so that it has both methods of spelling with Wylie not as the default? ---User:Hottentot
[edit] Adiu!
Ai vist que parlas occitan! Avem besonh d'ajuda e de contribucions per far avançar lo projècte en lenga d'òc... Ès benvengut se vòls participar! :)
A lèu! [[1]]
Cedric31 21:11, 21/02/06 (UTC)
[edit] Distiction between optical density and absorbance
In the article on optical absorbance you made the edit that it is absorbance/pathlength. However, I can't find a source that verifies this. I agree that your definition makes more sense than simply saying absorbance and optical density are synonymous but it would be good to cite a reference.
Where does your definition come from, and could you add it to the reference?
-Justin
