User talk:Zir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome, Zir!

But also... I noticed that you edited someone else's comment for clarity, spelling or grammar. As a rule, refrain from editing others' comments without their permission. Though it may appear helpful to correct typing errors, grammar, etc., please do not go out of your way to bring talk pages to publishing standards, since it is not terribly productive and will tend to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thanks, ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BBC Project Logo

The boxes at the top are are a smple of the type of boxes logos that BBC have had in its lifetime. I dont think there was a grey version unless it was a black and white version of the TV-Colours box. Unisouth 16:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WP:BBC

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the BBC WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the British Broadcasting Corporation.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Unisouth

08:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BBC logo

The BBC squares (when together as three) and all other BBC logos are licenced as Logos and therefore can only be used in the article namespace. However the font used in the latest boxes (gill sans) can be used anywhere. The page you mentioned does not allow grey boxes. Unisouth 08:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Society of Television Lighting Directors

Society of Television Lighting Directors has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant concerns. An example of notability guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (websites). If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

I've just said this on the talk page:

I've just removed the "prod" warning because I object most strongly - please tell me how the article needs to be improved and I shall endeavour to do so. Perhaps MER-C would like to try typing "STLD" into any search engine and it will come up with this society high in the rankings (most UK ones will put it at the top) only on Google is it beaten by STEEL DYNAMICS, INC. who use STLD as their short code on the Stock Exchange. I can think of better "Entertainment industry societies" for this treatment, but certainly not this oneZir 17:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] IPod Index

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article IPod Index, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Tagishsimon (talk) 19:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. See my reply at the same page. --Tagishsimon (talk)

[edit] Fair use image on your userpage

Hello Zir, I have removed Image:BBC Logo pre 1997.gif from your user page as it is a fair use image. Under fair use criterion #9, such images cannot be used outside the article namespace. Thanks, mattbr³⁰ 23:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)