Talk:Phelsuma

漢>A	A version of this article in Dutch has been listed at Wikipedia:Translation into English/Dutch. If you'd like to translate it, sign your name there, or, if you'd also like the article to be translated, sign your name there under "Supported:".

459 references for a 300 word article? Something is out of balance here! -- Michael Tinkler, sticking his toe back in wikipedia after a year off

The reasons I added this rather long reference list to the main Phelsuma article are:

that this main Phelsuma page links to many articles on Phelsuma species. In many of the listed references, more than one species is described, so I would have to duplicate those references many times (for each described species), which seems a waste of disk space. I would rather link each reference (record) to the different articles (other records), like a relational database, but alas wikipedia doesn't allow for this.
If one wants to read more about this genus, this list is a starting point.

We could of course create a new article "Phelsuma literature".

Jurriaan 12:09, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hello,

Concerning the Phelsuma article, I'd like to know what people would like to have improved / added most urgently. Jurriaan 11:42, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)

IMO, that enormous reference list needs to go. How about moving it here to talk: instead? Bryan 04:00, 16 May 2004 (UTC)