Photoelectric effect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A diagram illustrating the emission of photoelectrons from a metal plate, requiring energy gained from an incoming photon to be more than the work function of the material.

The photoelectric effect is a quantum electronic phenomenon in which photoelectrons are emitted from matter after the absorption of energy from electromagnetic radiation such as x-rays.^[1] The effect is also termed the Hertz Effect^[2][3], due to its discovery by Heinrich Rudolf Hertz, although the term has generally fallen out of use in more current terminology.

Study of the photoelectric effect led to important steps in understanding the quantum nature of light, due to several attempts to explain it using both wave and particle theories, and influenced the formation of the concept of wave–particle duality. ^[1]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/13/Button_enter.png Line break

[edit] Introduction

Upon exposing a metallic surface to electromagnetic radiation that is above a threshold frequency (which is specific to the type of surface and material), the photons are absorbed and current is produced. No electrons are emitted for radiation with a frequency below that of the threshold, as the electrons are unable to gain sufficient energy to overcome the electrostatic barrier presented by the termination of the crystalline surface (the material's work function). In 1905 it was known that the energy of the photoelectrons increased with increasing frequency of incident light, but the manner of the increase was not experimentally determined to be linear until 1915 when Robert Andrews Millikan showed that Einstein was correct.^[4]

By conservation of energy, the energy of the photon is absorbed by the electron and, if sufficient, the electron can escape from the material with a finite kinetic energy. A single photon can only eject a single electron, as the energy of one photon may only be absorbed by one electron. The electrons that are emitted are often termed photoelectrons.

The photoelectric effect helped further wave-particle duality, whereby physical systems (such as photons, in this case) display both wave-like and particle-like properties and behaviours, a concept that was used by the creators of quantum mechanics. The photoelectric effect was explained mathematically by Albert Einstein, who extended the work on quanta developed by Max Planck.

[edit] Explanation

The photons of the light beam have a characteristic energy given by the frequency of the light. In the photoemission process, if an electron absorbs the energy of one photon and has more energy than the work function, it is ejected from the material. If the photon energy is too low, however, the electron is unable to escape the surface of the material. Increasing the intensity of the light beam does not change the energy of the constituent photons, only their number, and thus the energy of the emitted electrons does not depend on the intensity of the incoming light.

Electrons can absorb energy from photons when irradiated, but they follow an "all or nothing" principle. All of the energy from one photon must be absorbed and used to liberate one electron from atomic binding, or the energy is re-emitted. If the photon is absorbed, some of the energy is used to liberate it from the atom, and the rest contributes to the electron's kinetic (moving) energy as a free particle.

[edit] Laws of photoelectric emission

1. For a given metal and frequency of incident radiation, the number of photoelectrons ejected per second is directly proportional to the intensity of the incident light.
2. For a given metal, there exists a certain minimum frequency of incident radiation below which no emission of photoelectrons takes place. This frequency is called the threshold frequency.
3. Above the threshold frequency, the maximum kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectron is independent of the intensity of the incident light but depends only upon the frequency (or wavelength) of the incident light.
4. The time lag between the incidence of radiation and the emission of a photoelectron is very small, less than 10^-9 seconds.

[edit] Equations

In analysing the photoelectric effect quantitatively using Einstein's method, the following equivalent equations are used:

Energy of photon = Energy needed to remove an electron + Kinetic energy of the emitted electron

Algebraically:

where

• h is Planck's constant,
• f is the frequency of the incident photon,
• is the work function, the minimum energy required to remove a delocalised electron from the surface of any given metal,
• is the maximum kinetic energy of ejected electrons,
• f₀ is the threshold frequency for the photoelectric effect to occur,
• m is the rest mass of the ejected electron, and
• v_m is the velocity of the ejected electron.

Note: If the photon's energy (hf) is not greater than the work function (φ), no electron will be emitted. The work function is sometimes denoted W. According to Einstein's special theory of relativity the relation between energy (E) and momentum (p) of a particle is , where m is the rest mass of the particle and c is the velocity of light in a vacuum.

[edit] Three-step model

The photoelectric effect in crystalline material is often decomposed into three steps:

1. Inner photoelectric effect (see photodiode below). The hole left behind can give rise to auger effect, which is visible even when the electron does not leave the material. In molecular solids phonons are excited in this step and may be visible as lines in the final electron energy. The inner photoeffect has to be dipole allowed. The transition rules for atoms translate via the tight-binding model onto the crystal. They are similar in geometry to plasma oscillations in that they have to be transversal.
2. Ballistic transport of half of the electrons to the surface. Some electrons are scattered.
3. Some of the electrons can run against the potential step at the surface and escape, others are reflected. Within the material the electrons are screened, on metals the screen will easily enlarge into an image charge (Schottky effect), but on isolaters it will cost the electron some energy.

In the one-step model an electron can take multiple paths through this three steps. All paths can interfere in the sense of the path integral formulation. For surface states and molecules the three-step model does still make some sense as even most atoms have multiple electrons which can scatter the one electron leaving.

[edit] History

[edit] Early observations

In 1839, Alexandre Edmond Becquerel observed the photoelectric effect via an electrode in a conductive solution exposed to light. In 1873, Willoughby Smith found that selenium is photoconductive.

[edit] Hertz's spark gaps

Heinrich Hertz, in 1887, made observations of the photoelectric effect and of the production and reception of electromagnetic (EM) waves, published in the journal Annalen der Physik. His receiver consisted of a coil with a spark gap, whereupon a spark would be seen upon detection of EM waves. He placed the apparatus in a darkened box in order to see the spark better; he observed, however, that the maximum spark length was reduced when in the box. A glass panel placed between the source of EM waves and the receiver absorbed ultraviolet radiation that assisted the electrons in jumping across the gap. When removed, the spark length would increase. He observed no decrease in spark length when he substituted quartz for glass, as quartz does not absorb UV radiation. Hertz concluded his months of investigation and reported the results obtained. He did not further pursue investigation of this effect, nor did he make any attempt at explaining how the observed phenomenon was brought about.

[edit] JJ Thomson: electrons

In 1899, Joseph John Thomson investigated ultraviolet light in Crookes tubes. Influenced by the work of James Clerk Maxwell, Thomson deduced that cathode rays consisted of negatively charged particles, later called electrons, which he called "corpuscles". In the research, Thomson enclosed a metal plate (a cathode) in a vacuum tube, and exposed it to high frequency radiation. It was thought that the oscillating electromagnetic fields caused the atoms' field to resonate and, after reaching a certain amplitude, caused a subatomic "corpuscle" to be emitted, and current to be detected. The amount of this current varied with the intensity and color of the radiation. Larger radiation intensity or frequency would produce more current.

[edit] Radiant energy

Photoelectric motor, US685957
Rays falling on insulated conductor connected to a capacitor: the capacitor charges electrically.

Nikola Tesla described the photoelectric effect in 1901. He described such radiation as vibrations of aether of small wavelengths which ionized the atmosphere. On November 5, 1901, he received the patent US685957 (Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy) that describes radiation charging and discharging conductors (e.g., a metal plate or piece of mica) by "radiant energy". Tesla used this effect to charge a capacitor with energy by mean of a conductive plate (i.e., a solar cell precursor). The radiant energy threw off with great velocity minute particles (i.e., electrons) which were strongly electrified. The patent specified that the radiation (or radiant energy) included many different forms. These devices have been referred to as "Photoelectric alternating current stepping motors".

In practice, a polished metal plate in radiant energy (e.g. sunlight) will gain a positive charge as electrons are emitted by the plate. As the plate charges positively, electrons form a electrostatic force on the plate (because of surface emissions of the photoelectrons), and "drain" any negatively charged capacitors. As the rays or radiation fall on the insulated conductor (which is connected to a capacitor), the condenser will indefinitely charge electrically.

[edit] Von Lenard's observations

In 1902, Philipp von Lenard observed the variation in electron energy with light frequency.^[5] He used a powerful electric arc lamp which enabled him to investigate large changes in intensity, and had sufficient power to enable him to investigate the variation of potential with light frequency. His experiment directly measured potentials, not electron kinetic energy: he found the electron energy by relating it to the maximum stopping potential (voltage) in a phototube. He found that the calculated maximum electron kinetic energy is determined by the frequency of the light. For example, an increase in frequency results in an increase in the maximum kinetic energy calculated for an electron upon liberation - ultraviolet radiation would require a higher applied stopping potential to stop current in a phototube than blue light. However Lenard's results were qualitative rather than quantitative because of the difficulty in performing the experiments: the experiments needed to be done on freshly cut metal so that the pure metal was observed, but it oxidised in a matter of minutes even in the partial vacuums he used. The current emitted by the surface was determined by the light's intensity, or brightness: doubling the intensity of the light doubled the number of electrons emitted from the surface. Lenard did not know of photons.

[edit] Einstein: light quanta

Albert Einstein's mathematical description in 1905 of how it was caused by absorption of what were later called photons, or quanta of light, in the interaction of light with the electrons in the substance, was contained in the paper named "On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Production and Transformation of Light". This paper proposed the simple description of "light quanta" (later called "photons") and showed how they could be used to explain such phenomena as the photoelectric effect. The simple explanation by Einstein in terms of absorption of single quanta of light explained the features of the phenomenon and helped explain the characteristic frequency. Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect won him the Nobel Prize (in Physics) of 1921.

The idea of light quanta was motivated by Max Planck's published law of black-body radiation ("On the Law of Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum". Annalen der Physik 4 (1901)) by assuming that Hertzian oscillators could only exist at energies E proportional to the frequency f of the oscillator by E = hf, where h is Planck's constant. Einstein, by assuming that light actually consisted of discrete energy packets, wrote an equation for the photoelectric effect that fit experiments (it explained why the energy of the photoelectrons was dependent only on the frequency of the incident light and not on its intensity: a low intensity, high frequency source could supply a few high energy photons, whereas a high intensity, low frequency source would supply no photons of sufficient individual energy to dislodge any electrons). This was an enormous theoretical leap and the reality of the light quanta was strongly resisted. The idea of light quanta contradicted the wave theory of light that followed naturally from James Clerk Maxwell's equations for electromagnetic behavior and, more generally, the assumption of infinite divisibility of energy in physical systems. Even after experiments showed that Einstein's equations for the photoelectric effect were accurate there was resistance to the idea of photons, since it appeared to contradict Maxwell's equations, which were believed to be well understood and well verified.

Einstein's work predicted that the energy of the ejected electrons would increase linearly with the frequency of the light. Perhaps surprisingly, that had not yet been tested. In 1905 it was known that the energy of the photoelectrons increased with increasing frequency of incident light -- and independent of the intensity of the light -- but the manner of the increase was not experimentally determined to be linear until 1915 when Robert Andrews Millikan showed that Einstein was correct.^[6]

[edit] Effect on wave-particle question

The photoelectric effect helped propel the then-emerging concept of the dual nature of light, that light exhibits characteristics of waves and particles at different times. The effect was impossible to understand in terms of the classical wave description of light, as the energy of the emitted electrons did not depend on the intensity of the incident radiation. Classical theory predicted that the electrons could 'gather up' energy over a period of time, and then be emitted. For such a classical theory to work a pre-loaded state would need to persist in matter. The idea of the pre-loaded state was discussed in Millikan's book Electrons (+ & -) and in Compton and Allison's book X-Rays in Theory and Experiment. These ideas were abandoned.

[edit] Uses and effects

[edit] Photodiodes

Solar cells (used in solar power) and light-sensitive diodes use a variant of the photoelectric effect, but not ejecting electrons out of the material. In semiconductors, light of even relatively low energy, such as visible photons, can kick electrons out of the valence band and into the higher-energy conduction band, where they can be harnessed, creating electric current at a voltage related to the bandgap energy.

[edit] Image sensors

Video camera tubes in the early days of television used the photoelectric effect; newer variants used photoconductive rather than photoemissive materials.

Silicon image sensors, such as charge-coupled devices, widely used for photographic imaging, are based on a variant of the photoelectric effect, in which photons knock electrons out of the valence band of energy states in a semiconductor, but not out of the solid itself.

[edit] Electroscopes

Electroscopes are fork-shaped, hinged metallic leaves placed in a vacuum jar, partially exposed to the outside environment. When an electroscope is charged positively or negatively, the two leaves separate, as charge distributes evenly along the leaves causing repulsion between two like poles. When ultraviolet radiation (or any radiation above threshold frequency) shines onto the metallic outside of the electroscope, a negatively charged scope will discharge and the leaves will collapse, while nothing will happen to a positively charged scope (besides charge decay). The reason is that electrons will be liberated from the negatively charged one, gradually making it neutral, while liberating electrons from the positively charged one will make it even more positive, keeping the leaves apart

[edit] Photoelectron spectroscopy

Since the energy of the photoelectrons emitted is exactly the energy of the incident photon minus the material's work function or binding energy, the work function of a sample can be determined by bombarding it with a monochromatic X-ray source or UV source (typically a helium discharge lamp), and measuring the kinetic energy distribution of the electrons emitted.

Using lasers, different photon energies are available. This method allows looking into the bulk, or into nanostructures on the top, or with 50 eV at the topmost atomic layer. Laser pulses can be used for time-resolved two-photon PES to monitor dynamics. They also allow the use of time-of-flight spectrometers for 10 eV ranges, using fewer electrons.

Photoelectron spectroscopy is done in a high vacuum environment, since the electrons would be scattered by air.

A typical electron energy analyzer is a concentric hemispherical analyser (CHA), which uses an electric field to divert electrons different amounts depending on their kinetic energies. For every element and core atomic orbital there will be a different binding energy. The many electrons created from each will then show up as spikes in the analyzer, and can be used to determine the elemental composition of the sample.^[7]

[edit] Spacecraft

The photoelectric effect will cause spacecraft exposed to sunlight to develop a positive charge. This can get up to the tens of volts. This can be a major problem, as other parts of the spacecraft in shadow develop a negative charge (up to several kilovolts) from nearby plasma, and the imbalance can discharge through delicate electrical components. The static charge created by the photoelectric effect is self-limiting, though, because a more highly-charged object gives up its electrons less easily.^[8]

[edit] Moon dust

Light from the sun hitting lunar dust causes it to become charged through the photoelectric effect. The charged dust then repels itself and lifts off the surface of the Moon by electrostatic levitation. This manifests itself almost like an "atmosphere of dust", visible as a thin haze and blurring of distant features, and visible as a dim glow after the sun has set. This was first photographed by the Surveyor program probes in the 1960s. It is thought that the smallest particles are repelled up to kilometers high, and that the particles move in "fountains" as they charge and discharge.^[9][10]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

[edit] Notes

1. ^ ^{a b} Serway, R. S.(1990), p1150' Describes the photoelectric effect as the "Emission of photoelectrons from matter", and describes the original usage as the "Emission of Photoelectrons from metallic surfaces" after the experiments of Milikan, and others.
2. ^ The American journal of science. (1880). New Haven: J.D. & E.S. Dana. Page 234
3. ^ Wolfram Scienceworld describes the terminology of the photoelectric effect and the previous usage of the term Hertz Effect.
4. ^ Millikan, Robert Andrews (1916). "A Direct Photoelectric Determination of Planck's "h"". Physical Review VII: 362. 
5. ^ http://www.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/photoelectric_effect.html
6. ^ http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys314/lectures/photoe/photoe.html
7. ^ Photoelectron spectroscopy
8. ^ Spacecraft charging
9. ^ - Moon fountains
10. ^ - Dust gets a charge in a vacuum

[edit] Book References

Serway, R. A. (1990). Physics for engineers and scientists, 3^rd ed. Saunders Publishing

[edit] External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to:

Photoelectric effect

• Nave, R., "Wave-Particle Duality". HyperPhysics.
• Jpaul's "Photovoltaics: Theory and Practice". Photoelectric effect.
• "Photoelectric effect". Physics 2000. University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.
• ACEPT W3 Group, "The Photoelectric Effect". Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
• Haberkern, Thomas, and N Deepak "Grains of Mystique: Quantum Physics for the Layman". Einstein Demystifies Photoelectric Effect, Chapter 3.
• Department of Physics, "The Photoelectric effect". Physics 320 Laboratory, Davidson College, Davidson.
• Fowler, Michael, "The Photoelectric Effect". Physics 252, University of Virginia.
• Brandl, Michael, "MISN-0-213 The Photoelectric Effect" (PDF file), Project PHYSNET.
• Quantum Chemistry I Lecture

Applets

• Curull, Xavi Espinal, "Photoelectric effect Applet". (Java)
• Fendt, Walter, and Taha Mzoughi, "The Photoelectric Effect". (Java)
• "Applet: Photo Effect". Open Source Distributed Learning Content Management and Assessment System. (Java)