Talk:2006 Super 14 Final
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
2006 Super 14 Final is part of WikiProject Rugby union, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to Rugby union. If you would like to participate, you can edit 2006 Super 14 Final, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and view a list of open tasks |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
2006 Super 14 Final has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 |
An entry from 2006 Super 14 Final appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 3 June 2006. |
 |
I'm putting this up for DKY. BTW, good work! --HamedogTalk|@ 03:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] "Gorillas in the Mist"
Oy! I coined that first :P (not exactly directing this at anyone in particular, just miffed that journalist stole "my" catchphrase! Perhaps they edit WP?! -- PageantUpdater 03:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thats pretty weird. Email them, claiming copyright infringment. Just Joking. But odd that the journalist did use your idea. --HamedogTalk|@ 04:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Final or final
I think the correct title is 2006 Super 14 final...thoughts? Cvene64 09:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Seeing as Political and Legal Studies is my favourite subject at school, lets go by precedence.
-
- 2006 UEFA Champions League Final Capital F
- Finals - a series of knockout rounds culminating in a Grand Final Capital F.
- Also, look at FIFA World Cup, the start of the second paragraph in the lead, in spells Finals like that mid sentance. Go with the precident I say--HamedogTalk|@ 03:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- If you can find some articles in favour of the other, I am willing to support a page move, but at the moment, I think we should follow the trend, as mentioned above. --HamedogTalk|@ 09:49, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Penalty
I can't remember for sure but how did the Hurricanes get a penalty from Rico Gear dropping the ball? Wouldn't that have been a scrum? This is very unclear and needs to be cleaned up. - Shudda talk 02:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Probably a penalty at the scrum. Any way, how about this:The Hurricanes managed to get themselves into Crusaders territory through a high ball that Rico Gear dropped. In the resulting play, the Crusaders consedided a penalty, giving Holwell the first chance to score, near the touchline. However, his kick went under the cross bar. --HamedogTalk|@ 03:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Separate quotes?
Was this all one exchange?
- Commentator Grant Nisbith:"Toeava kicks off"
- Colour Commentator Murray Mexted:"Not 10, is it?"
- Nisbith:"I don't know" — This type of commentating was typical during the night.[12]
If so, it should be formatted differently. --Dhartung | Talk 02:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- It is one exchange. Any suggestions for new formating?
The only thing worse than having fog completely obscure a rugby game, is having no fog to obscure it.
[edit] Handbag incident
Just gotta say that the handbag incident as it is written makes no sense at all. Masoe was tripped, then beaten, and finally fined $3000? I'm assuming there's more to it than that.
[edit] YouTube links
This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally. Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 06:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
