User talk:67.171.129.162
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is my page... I can do what I want with it. If you or your stupid bots don't like that... tough. Reverting or dribbling any of your admin magic pee on *MY* talk page will only encourage me to vandalize wikipedia articles. OTOH, if everyone leaves my talk page alone, it's likely that I'll be too busy reading the excellent featured content here on Wikipedia to make any pathetic attempts at vandalism. This is truly a win-win. If you don't believe me, take a look at the history of this page... I've only vandalized articles after my talk page had been touched.
Wikipedia will fail to survive if the admins & bot-chumps don't pull their heads out of their respective (or each other's?) corn-holes. There are far more vandals than admins and bots are proving to be highly ineffective when it comes to handling vandalism. I claim that the focus should be on vandalism of articles that people actually read, not a talk-page for some poor anonymous user's IP.
67.171.129.162 11:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am tard bucket admin fatty! I use tarded bots to sprinkle admin magic pee on articles that I don't understand. Me butt-humper! Blargh, I will give you the benefit of the doubt this poop time. But I will be watching for the poop train! Hope you butt-hump me... blargh, blargh, blargh!!! I lied, I am not butt-humper... me super butt-humper. Also, I am butt-humper corn-hole sniffer. Blargh, this is your last chance to (blargh) butt hump me... as in last warning', if you continue not to do it, (blargh) you will be my ham! I have now (blargh) given you fair butt-hump warning. Alright? Still, butt-hump dog poo about hump-hump is (blargh) (not) against the poop rules, no matter whose talk poop it is. Bsroiaadn 12:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- It's not a rule, it's just "often frowned upon"... kinda like sleeping with your sister. From Wikipedia:Vandalism:
- Talk page vandalism
- Removing the comments of other users from talk pages other than your own, aside from removing internal spam, vandalism, etc. is generally considered vandalism. Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long talk page by creating an archive page and moving the text from the main talk page there. 'The above rules do not apply to a user's own talk page', where this policy does not itself prohibit the removal and archival of comments at the user's discretion. Please note, though, that 'removing warnings from one's own talk page is often frowned upon'. ciao, 67.171.129.162 20:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's not a rule, it's just "often frowned upon"... kinda like sleeping with your sister. From Wikipedia:Vandalism:
![]() | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |