User talk:72.138.191.63
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Wikipedia is not a battleground
Please see WP:CIVIL. I am referring to your messages to another user:
write down whatever you want but remember revert the comprehensive list to the old version. Thanks! 72.138.191.63 16:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC) Pay attention to the Polish guy (83.14.222.106) or 212.51.199.173. He is a trouble-maker and always change the list and put "Taiwan" on the list of country. If you see that, please help me to revert to the older version. Thanks!! 72.138.191.63 16:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
We try to avoid edit and revert wars. Please, if you have an issue, talk about it, don't just revert each other's edits.
By the way, it is understood that Taiwan's status as a country is disputed; however, this is why the developed country article refers to it as an entity, rather than a country.
--PeregrineAY 10:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
PS. if this is not the user who made those comments, please ignore =P (since this is an IP address)
[edit] Macau history
Dear sir or madam,macau was once the portugues colony,but it doesnt mean its history start from portugese colony.--Ksyrie 05:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
The topic of Macau is only the introduction. The topic of Macau is pretty long. Would you please add the detail in the topic of History of Macau. If you want to add more information about imperial time, please write it briefly. And also, please write under the category of History. 72.138.191.63 17:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- you cannot justify your word.The history of macau is so long,the time between 16th and 20th cann't be the representative of its history.I have noticed that the contents of history of macau between 16th and 20th is at least 5 times larger than the its history between 2th BC and 16th.So the imperial time cann't be seen as too long.And why not you classify the history of between 16th and 20th under the category of History?Be neutral.And don't try to revert my edit,if not you risk to violate the 3RT.--Ksyrie 20:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Be Wikipedia:Civility,I warn you you had violated the 3revert policy of Wiki.Don't do that again.--Ksyrie 00:32, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- You are very respected to contribute the majority of this article.However,the 3revert is a policy for everyone.Otherwise,for your critic of one ,put the imperial time as a one of the category exclusive to History. You didn't put as 2.1 ,I am so confused.Just check the table of contents for macau
-
* 2.1 Imperial times * 2.2 Sixteenth to eighteenth centuries * 2.3 Nineteenth century * 2.4 Before the 1960s * 2.5 After the 1960s * 2.6 Transitional period, handover
The imperial times is classified as 2.1.And I thought I once made a mistake of == for ===,later I rewrote the imperial times as ===.So It's just a mistake.Please feel free to correct the mistakes.--Ksyrie 04:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The nature of Macau
1) I delete all the categories referring macau as a country and nation.The reason is as follows Macau Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China which clearly demonstrates Macau is a subdivision of People's Republic of China,not a country, a nation or a state.Despite Macau is a Dependent territory within China
see the exemple of Åland and Svalbard which donn't include any category of country or nation. 2)
I delete the portuguese empire category which I found the exsitence of this tag without reason.See Brazil which was also a part of portuguese empire,but in this page no the tag of portuguese empire.--Ksyrie 23:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC) --Ksyrie 02:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me, but I've provided proof that "Encountering Macau" is indeed a history book. Read the chapters I have provided on the talk page.
[edit] Sorry.
My bad. Continue on. --Darkest Hour 21:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Macau rating
It is confusing, but different WikiProjects use the rating system in different ways. The ratings are being applied by different groups of people and there is no attempt to get them to agree on the same standards. This was discussed at Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team#A-quality rating.
If you have further questions please post them at Talk:Macau, the comments subpage is really not for discussion. --Ideogram 04:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |
