Talk:Adrian Lamo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] See comments | ||
 |
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class. |
Contents |
[edit] Legal woes
It would be nice to know if he is incarcerated or was he released on OR? Since he is sentenced in June 2004, I guess this will be moot soon. -- manchineel
- Apart from time spent in custody for processing, he was not incarcerated. He was released on $250,000 bond, and has since been sentenced to house arrest and probation. Hope this helps :) --Adrian 16:18, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Confusion
- Lamo's thoughts are largely unpublished but have been shared with a small group of researchers in related areas. Privately held works attribute both his easy entry into highly secured networks and his involvement in other, less public phenomena to an amalgamation of separate, unique events and situations at points and times reachable only by an abandonment of any effort to identify patterns related to them.
Ok... who added this? and... more importantly... what does it mean? I believe this should be wikified.
- Lamo's Thoughts -> Lamo's Techniques
- Privately held works -> Privately held manuscripts
- etc...
That's assuming my understanding is correct
-
- Manuscripts? Where'd that come from? I don't remember writing any manuscripts on this =x
- Adrian Lamo 10:02, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] A.C. Edit
- Added info regarding his techniques, added attribution link to wired
- Removed part of a ridiculously long and incomprihensible sentence: ...to an collection of separate, unique events and situations at points and times reachable only by an abandonment of any effort to identify patterns related to them.
- Removed ;'s on links (not std Wikipedia)
- Request: Someone crop, rotate the image as requested. (see talk page on image)
- Request: Someone please edit the language. It still contains philosophical/eccentric wording. (Tip: Don't Drink and Edit =)
-
- If I drink and edit, post something on the net, then have it be referenced on Wikipedia, does it become canon enough to keep 'cos I said it and it's verifiable? :)
- To be fair, I can't really complain about the choice of language. A lot of what I've said publically is pretty opaque. It's *meant* to be. Clarity is not a goal that should be achieved at the expense of accuracy. I am not network news; I'm not broadcasting to the lowest common denominator. I did what I did, now I do what I do.
- Which isn't to say I don't deeply appreciate each and every constructive edit made to this article. Thank you, for helping to make this little corner of Wikipedia more readable :)
- Adrian Lamo 16:22, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Birthday
- Request: This might be a minor detail but most biographies in wikipedia provide us with the exact date of birth of the subject. I would like to know the birthday :D Viruswitch 11:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
For obvious privacy reasons and the identity fraud proliferation, I suggest to leave the issue alone. --Irpen 01:43, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- I do not think that is relevant at all if the date is already published online, unless you can point out a specific threat that would be made manifest by the addition of this information (more so than for those other living people whose birthdays appear on Wikipedia)... has Mr Lamo's arch-nemesis sworn to steal his identity if he could just discover his date of birth? If it isn't already available online, well, that is a different matter. NicM 08:52, 6 February 2006 (UTC).
I don't know whether it is available online and the reason why I don't know is that I didn't care to check because I am not interested in the exact DOB of A. L. Anyone is welcome to dig out the date, if it is already available, and post it here, citing a source. It is a different matter to pressure a subject of the article to reveal the date himself. It is his business whether he wants to answer a personal question. --Irpen 19:10, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'm all about helping Wikipedia in random ways, but I like my birthday nebulous, and it's not available online anywhere, to the very best of my knowledge. So even if I confirmed it, I couldn't cite sources :)
- It was just a question, in fact I wanted to know what Adrian's Zodiac Sign is. He replied in my userpage that he doesnt want to publish that and the matter is settled. Maybe I should have just deleted the question when I got a reply (I still can :D hehe). Making a big fuss out of nothing :P. Viruswitch 10:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
- The fuss wasn't entirely in re. your question, Viruswitch :) There was a brief spree of vandalism to the main article involving my birthday. (It's not February 30th ;x)
- Whoops, I was not aware of that! Thanks for the email :). I am very very happy to know! :) Viruswitch 08:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Just doing a google and on the first page I found a month (not a date though). Just noting :\ — Ilyanep (Talk) 03:49, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- I had found that too but was not sure whether the site was worthy of reliance.Viruswitch 13:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- You might call me a paranoiac, but I'm not the only one ... :) Adrian Lamo ·· 00:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- As for "it's not available online anywhere", I couldn't help but notice that on your myspace profile an acquaintance left a message saying "have a wonderful birthday today" on February 20th. ;-) --SedatedRX 08:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- It may not be The New York Times (no pun intended) but I'd presume this person knows A.L. reasonably well.--SedatedRX 19:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Damage?
I am confused about the "damage" Adrian supposedly caused by breaking into these networks. What was it? (Not to be POV, but this is the discussion page, and from what I have read, he seems well intentioned and to have done a lot of good.) Armedblowfish 05:36, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Making "DNA controversy" longer
NicM, since you thought the stuff about the history of the federal government required DNA sampling and the ACLU's opposition to it was irrelevant, I was wondering if you had any suggestions for making that more than a 1-paragraph section? Armedblowfish 00:19, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Not really, no. We'll have to see how events pan out. A neutral summary of the issue and its relevence to the case may be appropriate (are the ACLU even involved aside from making a couple of comments?) although I think such a summary would be much better in Combined DNA Index System or ACLU or elsewhere. It would be nice to know what Adrian Lamo's religious objections are but it seems to be somewhat vague. I'd like to see a quote from the other side too, we have one from his lawyer, one from the govt would be nice too. NicM 09:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Wikinews
So I'm writing an article to be released for the May 30 hearing. See here. So far, it's just a story preparation that is basically just from here / Wired, but I intend to interview Adrian. Anyways, as I'm not used to this, help/advice would be appreciated. Also, I don't know how to go about getting an interview/quotes from the other side, but if anyone else could, that would be great (for the sake of NPOV). Armedblowfish 00:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Categories
I think we need to check the categories: Lamo's from California and Massachusetts? Isn't it just Massachusetts? --maru (talk) contribs 03:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- The dual categorization is accurate. — Adrian Lamo ·· 02:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- For what reason? The dual categorisation is confusing, so unless you have a good reason we can explain in the article I think we should eliminate one of them. NicM 22:37, 23 May 2006 (UTC).
- If you're concerned about categories, you may want to look into "Living People" -- I was in a car accident (as a passenger) in early May of '06, and the first EMT that checked me after I crawled (upwards, out of a nose-down smoking vehicle) couldn't find a pulse :P
- — Adrian Lamo ·· 02:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- I just don't understand how you can be from both places at once- the location where one was born is a rather binary proposition. Unless parts of you were borne to two different women (one in Massachusetts and t'other in California), and then in a mockery of God's creation, stitched together into a monstrous chimera to trouble the Earth, it would seem nigh impossible. --maru (talk) contribs 03:21, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- I don't think "from" necessarily means "born in". If you spend a large amount of your life in any given place, you may eventually consider yourself "from" that place. Armedblowfish 21:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Generally one is only "from" one place. Not always the place you were born, sometimes the place you spent most of your life, live currently, grew up: different people have different definitions, but it is still only once place. NicM 22:37, 23 May 2006 (UTC).
- I don't think "from" necessarily means "born in". If you spend a large amount of your life in any given place, you may eventually consider yourself "from" that place. Armedblowfish 21:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- If one is raised in a place, or lives in a place, or is a Hoosier etc. that's fine, but one is not from that place- where one is from is generally understood in these categories as birthplaces. Perhaps we can scrap the California one, since he was born in Massachusetts as I recall. --maru (talk) contribs 23:47, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] Last name confusion?
This guy's last name really can't be Lamo, can it?
Imagine the everyday confusing insults the guy recieves, like "Hey, Lamo!" or "Lamewad, get over here". I dunno, my mind registers this as unpossible, however Wikipedia tells me this is true. However, my condolescences and sympathy goes out to the friends and family of Lamo for this sincere and confusing tragedy.--Mofomojo 12:10, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Now now. Perhaps everyone simply tactfully pronounces it "Lamb-o" instead of "Lame-o"? --maru (talk) contribs 02:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I think it's just pronounced Lamo, like lmao ... anyway, anytime I think of his last name, I picture him laughing his ass off. --Cyde↔Weys 02:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's pronounced with an "ah" sound. But it could easily be made fun of. The Ungovernable Force 04:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Middle name?
What is Adrian's middle name? I know it starts with A.
- The "A" doesn't stand for anything. It's just an A.
- ( a lie, but a plausible lie ... )
- —Adrian Lamo ·· 2007-02-05 07:26Z
[edit] Adrian At at Wikipedia
Who wrote this stuff? Seems like plain self-promotion to me.
- If you want to know, go look at the article history. It is laid out in exhaustive detail there. -- Gwern (contribs) 05:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia wrote it and "anyone" can edit.
-
- And if someone doesn't like to edit self-promotional material???
-
-
- Then they can go elsewhere, and edit some other material. Volunteer service here. --Gwern (contribs) 22:31 17 November 2006 (GMT)
-
[edit] Personal Homepage
The link to the personal homepage "Just Breath" is functioning but the site seems to have disappeared. :/ I wanted to read that lovecraft story again... What happened?
- http://resist.ca/~adrian/
- — Adrian Lamo ·· 23:09, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Salon.com as a source for this article
This article uses salon.com as a reference. A concern has been raised about the reliability of salon.com. You can read the following discussion and comment if you like. SeeTalk:Salon.com/as_a_source_for_WikipediaAndries 04:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
