Talk:AGM-65 Maverick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Related task forces (general topics):
	Military aviation task force
	Military technology and engineering task force
	Weaponry task force
Related task forces (nations and regions):
	United States military history task force

1 airlistbox
2 Newspeak.
3 Use by Luftwaffe
4 AGM-65

[edit] airlistbox

[minor change] I took the {{airlistbox}} outta the page because with the table it was kind of poorly juxtaposed. i'd be tickled if somebody would fix that for me. Avriette 17:29, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Newspeak.

What does "designed for close air support, prohibition, and forceful prevention" mean? -- Jeandré, 2006-07-15t18:58z

Beats me. I've removed it, in the hope that anyone replacing it will use actual English phrases to explain the meaning. -- Rogerborg 15:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Use by Luftwaffe

Unregistered IP had posted this:

Other nations: Luftwaffe F-4 Phantom II only, NOT TORNADO

at the bottom of the article. Someone knowledgable about this sort of thing should verify and, if confirmed, incorporate the correction properly. TeraBlight 22:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AGM-65

[anyone else notice...] AGM65 sucessfully redirects here, but AGM-65 does not, despite containing the correct command? the page just stalls and nothing comes up!? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.9.108.74 (talk • contribs).

Seems to work OK for me. I run IE7 on WinXPH. - BillCJ 20:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Works for me using Firefox on Ubuntu. -- Jeandré, 2007-01-06t00:03z

tested it on my other machine running firefox on fedora - works fine; but running IE6 on Win98SE, it doesn't redirect. must be some strange quirk. :¬/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.9.108.74 (talk • contribs) 2007-01-06t00:42:35z.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/g/m/Talk%7EAGM-65_Maverick_206f.html"

Categories: Start-Class military aviation articles | Military aviation task force articles | Start-Class military technology and engineering articles | Military technology and engineering task force articles | Start-Class weaponry articles | Weaponry task force articles | Start-Class United States military history articles | United States military history task force articles | Start-Class military history articles