Talk:Alternative TV
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This band's early music is terrific and deserves more attention. Why not say so, as did the first version?
- Because, although it is true that their early stuff was, as you say, terrific, the article cannot baldly say so while remaining neutral. The best way around this problem is to quote some named person or publication (NME, Melody Maker, John Peel, whatever) attesting to their terrifitude. This would also have the advantage of lending the article more authority than some random page on the web that just says "this band is triff". I hope this answers your question. GrahamN 00:32 9 Jun 2003 (UTC)