Talk:Amsterdam Admirals 2007
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject National Football League, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | |
[edit] Staff complete
There, I've added pages for all listed 2007 coaches and 2006 is just missing one now --Numbers47 19:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Awesome, I just completed Jaret Johnson and will start working on Noriaki Kinoshita now, the research that goes into these articles is crazy... I think I spend nearly 8 hours on Jaret alone, but then again I got something all other bio's and background stories on him missed... :) --Z Doc 22:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Roster Table
How do you guys feel about changing the roster table to:
| No | Player | Pos | College | Aquired |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Bramlet, Corey | QB | Wyoming | FA-2007 |
| 8 | Olsen, Drew | QB | UCLA | NFLDraft-1/Ravens |
| 9 | Pakulak, Glenn | P | Kentucky | NFL/Titans |
For clarity and removing redundancy since that info is readily available on the player his corresponding page (see: Corey Bramlet.
Cheers, Z Doc 23:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm
- I don't know. It looks pretty clear to me the way it is. (Also took a lot of time to add it ;)) Plus not all players have their own page or the info is not listed on it. Still, other people's thoughts? --Numbers47 07:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- I know you spend a lot of time completing the table, that's why I asked before acting... :) I'm working hard on giving each and every player their own page, it's a lot of research however (I only managed to do one profile last night for instance). I wouldnot want to change the roster layout untill we have all player pages up. The idea behind it is that we can make the roster table more condensed and have offense on the left and defense on the right, with PS, IR and special teams below. Z Doc 08:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Ah, I see. Well, once we get to that stage I think it may be worth considering yes. O# en D# separately would probably look more organized. --Numbers47 08:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
-
