Talk:Anglo-Chinese School (Independent)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Anglo-Chinese School (Independent) is part of SGpedians' Resources An attempt to better coordinate and organise articles related to Singapore. To participate, simply edit this page or visit our noticeboard for more info.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is also under the scope of WikiProject Schools. (Notice to all editing students and teachers)

[edit] Cleanup request

This entire article is in a terrible state. It is incoherent, messy and totally disinformative. Anyone wants to clean it up properly? The Fascist 14:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I agree, there seems to be a lot of propaganda inside. --T e rran command e r 17:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

CCA Lists updated -- FreezinD3v!L 03:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Propaganda is intrinsic to ACS(I) - this from an old boy ;)

I've more or less toned down the bias in the article. Is it acceptable now? Ariedartin JECJY ^Talk 12:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Needs to be cleaned up and all the ACSI propoganda to be gone for good. --Ter e nce Ong _{(T | C)} 13:06, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Right'o. After my common tests, sure. :) Ariedartin JECJY ^Talk 13:34, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

In my opinion, the clean-up has made the article (more) disjointed, (more) unreadable and totally disgusting. Readibility is more important than the presence of the "propaganda" that we worry so much about. The Fascist 09:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your most frank opinion. Unfortunately, your opinion does not run along Wikipedia policies of WP:NPOV. Readability plays second fiddle to the neutral and informative nature of a true encyclopedia. But of course, even short articles can be quite readable, like Squier Stratocaster, so I contend that point as well. Ariedartin JECJY ^Talk 12:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

How can you get information if you aren't able to read it?The Fascist 13:16, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I already told you: the information is readable. I acknowledge there are deficiencies in content like architecture and systems, but that does not compromise the readability of it. Furthermore, this is an encyclopedia, not a advertising agency. Please read the policies of Wikipedia before you make any further comment. Ariedartin JECJY ^Talk 04:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Cleaned up spelling mistakes, made some dividers in "achivements". Dga471 08:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC) Deleted some unappropriate, boasty bits in article - this article is overloaded with achievements! Take a look at, for example the Raffles Institution article, it has got much more information about the school itself! Dga471 09:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC)