Talk:Annika Sörenstam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Sörenstam
If her name is Sörenstam (and it is) then don't spell it Sorenstam in the article.
The change in the categories from Sorenstam to Sörenstam was not an attempt at "deliberate missorting" but an attempt at consistency. This being the English version of Wikipedia, we ought to have some sort of agreement on use of ö or not in this article. Mudforce 22:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Not everyone knows how to create the ö character on their keyboard. It might be an honest mistake. Crunch 23:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vijay
About Vijay's comments: it is tough to find out what he really said, and I didn't see his comments on TV. The media apparently twisted it around somewhat, and quoted him on some things, but left out other parts, which didn't lead to a complete quoting of what he really said. dave 01:24 19 May 2003 (UTC)
- Well done. Assuming those are from televised comments, or from newsprint and he was quoted correctly. Thanks. dave 19:54 19 May 2003 (UTC)
Some discussion on how to reference the fact that Sorenstam was born in Sweden has taken place recently (given the edits in the past few hours). I'd be interested in comments from others on my talk page on the subject. - Cafemusique 22:03 23 May 2003 (UTC)
I've swapped the redirect and the article, so the article is now titled with the correct spelling, and the accentless version is a redirect. --Brion 18:22 24 May 2003 (UTC)
[edit] Swedish atheists?
Someone added this article to the category Swedish Atheists. Is there a reference for this? Did you perhaps mean Swedish athletes? Without a reference, I propose deleting the link. Otherwise, add a reference. Crunch 17:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- This is so ridiculous it's not funny. Don't you understand we have better things to do? Not everyone belongs to the Church of George Bush and thank goodness most people on this planet don't have the idiotic ideas you have. Personal beliefs are PERSONAL and have no place in this Wiki. Whether you 'over there' grasp this or not. Leave the poor girl alone! And get on with your lives! And let her (and us) get on with ours! —Please sign your posts on talk pages. The preceding comment was added by 62.1.131.242 at 15:58, 5 August 2006.
- No reply, it's been removed. Crunch 19:40, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Point of View Flag
User:John Cho has flagged this article as having point of view issues but without any note on the discussion page as to what the point of view issues might be. Until the issues are addressed here, I have removed the POV flag. Crunch 02:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Photo in middle of results section
I think the addition of photos is generally a good idea, but I'm not sure the photo of Annika on the practice putting green at the 2006 British Open is helping, at least not where it's placed. It's in the middle of the LPGA wins section, which causes that section to shift off to the side. Can we find a better location for that photo? Or maybe we can do without it. Crunch 13:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
I've re-arranged the pictures. I think it looks better than before Mudforce 18:45, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Much better. Nice photos, too. Crunch 19:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Did you change this again? There is a photo now obscuring the Results in LPGA Majors sections. Maybe just reduce the size of the photos if you still want to have all of these in the article.Crunch 20:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- I changed the picture layout when the references went to a 2 column structure. This should be better. Mudforce 20:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's better, at least you can see all the text, but still not right. Can you see how "Kraft Nabisco Championship" wraps in the top table? Plus, when we add 2008, we'll run into more problems. I really recommend not putting a photo in that section. It's distracting and the photo isn't very informative anyway. How useful is another photo of Annika on the practice putting green where all you can see if the top of her head? Crunch 22:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- At my default screen resolution it's not a problem but I can see your point. I've resized the photos and re-arranged them, losing the one mentioned above. Mudforce 08:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA tip
I have not done a formal review, but if you want to get GA, fix the ref formatting, it's highly inconsistent.Rlevse 18:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ref formating fixed. Thanks for the tip Mudforce 19:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)