Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Clerks/Noticeboard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Evidence | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(./ t) | (p/ t) | (w/ t) | Betacommand (t) | 30 Mar 2007 | NYB | |
(./ t) | (p/ t) | (w/ t) | Darwinek (t) | 22 Mar 2007 | NYB | |
(./ t) | (p/ t) | (w/ t) | Freedom skies (t) | 20 Mar 2007 | PW | |
(./ t) | (p/ t) | (w/ t) | Falun Gong (t) | 2 Mar 2007 | ||
Voting | ||||||
(./ t) | (e/ t) | (w/ t) | Lukas19-LSLM (t) | 23 Mar 2007 | DM | |
(./ t) | (e/ t) | (w/ t) | Armenia-Azerbaijan (t) | Inj. | 23 Mar 2007 | |
(./ t) | (e/ t) | (w/ t) | InShaneee (t) | Inj. | 16 Mar 2007 | DB |
Motion to close | ||||||
— | ||||||
Recently closed (see all) | ||||||
Free Republic | 29 Mar 2007 | NYB | ||||
Barrett v. Rosenthal | 27 Mar 2007 | TT | ||||
Starwood | 24 Mar 2007 | NYB | ||||
Waldorf education | 20 Mar 2007 | PW |
Procedures
A procedural reference for clerks (and Arbitrators) is here.
Archives
Most comments here are not archived as they concern simple daily case administration and maintenance issues. Some interesting discussions are archived at Archive 1.
Conflict of interest
If a particular clerk has a serious conflict of interest regarding the subject-matter of a case or one or more of the parties to it, that clerk should recuse himself or herself from the case in favor of some other clerk. In any event, no clerk should have anything to do with a case in which he or she is a participant, except to the extent that he or she participates as a participant. A clerk who wishes to make a statement in a case or to provide evidence, must refrain from acting as a clerk with respect to that case. This does not prejudice his or her right to perform cosmetic refactoring of evidence and workshop pages, as is the right of any editor. In unclear situations, the Arbitration Committee should be consulted.
Calculation of majority
In opening a case we have to determine the majority for the case. This number goes in a statement at the head of Proposed decision.
Check for recent updates to the active list at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee, and check for arbitrators recused from the case. A majority is half the number of active arbitrators, rounded up to the nearest whole number, or plus one if the number of active arbs is an even number. For example, if there are 8 or 9 active arbitrators, the majority will be 5.
Updating the majority The majority should be calculated when the case is opened, and updated when the case is listed for voting. After a case is opened for voting, do not update the number of active arbitrators if an arbitrator becomes active, as that arbitrator may not feel capable of casting an informed vote. However, if the arbitrator does cast a vote, then consider him or her active on the case and update the majority if necessary. If an arbitrator goes on the inactive list during voting, recalculate the majority unless the arbitrator has already voted. The same procedures are followed when new arbitrators are appointed to the Arbitration Committee.
Arbitrators who vote "abstain" on a given proposal are deducted from the number of available arbitrators on that issue (i.e., the same as if they were recused on that issue). Thus, the majority with respect to such a proposal may be different from the remaining proposals in the same case.
- As of March 26, there are 12 active arbitrators (less any recusals) and the majority is 7 for new cases
Statement and Evidence Length
Requests at WP:RFAR should be kept to around 500 words. Evidence submissions should be kept to around 1000 words and 100 diffs. The arbitrators have asked us to remove excessively long evidence presentations and ask the parties to reduce their size.
- Template:ArbComSize may be used for this purpose.
- Usage: {{subst:ArbComSize}} --~~~~
- The generic {{notice}} template is also useful.
- Usage {{notice|The arbitration committee has asked that evidence presentations be kept to around 1000 words and 100 diffs. Your presentation is over xxxx words. Please edit your section to focus on the most relevant evidence. For the arbitration committee, ~~~~}}
Adding motions and injunctions to a case
The following codes should be used to indicate when a case in Evidence has either a motion or injunction opened for voting.
- {{Evidence|Case name|Date|m}} For a proposed motion, adds Motion to the template with a link to the proposed decision page. Use mm for a passed motion.
- {{Evidence|Case name|Date|i}} For proposed injunction, adds Inj. to the template with a link to the proposed decision page. Use ii for a passed injunction.
These codes also apply to {{ACVoting}} and {{Motion to close}}.
Applying article bans
The following templates may be applied to article talk pages to inform editors of user article bans.
- {{User article ban arb|User name|expiry date|Case name|Your name}}, which makes
Notes
- Subst'ing the templates creates an automatic signature.
- Using i as the expiry changes the language of the notice to read "this user has been banned indefinitely."
- To ban several users with the same expiry date, you may wish to subst the template and customize it, rather than posting several templates.
- An alternative template {{User article ban|User name|expiry date|Your name}} may also be used
Article probation
There are several forms of article probation. The generic template refers to the strictest form, in which editors who edit the article disruptively may be banned from the article. The arbitrators frequently use milder forms of article probation. Carefully read the decision and subst: and customize the notice as appropriate.
- {{Article probation}}
Contents |
[edit] Pending Actions
- Clerks and informal helpers, please coordinate your actions through this section, so that we don't have multiple clerks working on the same cases at the same time.
[edit] To be opened
- Cases should generally be opened 24 hours after the fourth net vote to accept.
[edit] Temporary injunctions
[edit] Reassignment
- Generally, the clerk who opens a case should follow the progress of the case and be available to answer questions from the parties. If for any reason you need someone to take over one or more of your current cases (too busy, wikibreak, etc.), post a request here.
[edit] To be closed
- Cases may be closed after after the fourth net vote to close, but generally wait at least 24 hours after the first motion to close. In cases where the arbitrators have disagreed and not all the findings or remedies have passed, wait at least 24 hours after the final close vote is cast to give other arbitrators a chance to raise objections.
[edit] Already closed
- Move cases here if you close them.
- Barrett v. Rosenthal done. Thatcher131 12:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Free Republic closed. Newyorkbrad 01:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Other work
If no one wants it, I'll help Armenia-Azerbaijan when it gets there. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 17:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've noted your interest if you're around on the day it's due to close. This will be a very controversial closing with probably several bans to be imposed, so we'll coordinate when the time draws closer. Newyorkbrad 17:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm afraid there'd be serious claims of COI if I gave any of them their upcoming year-long blocks, so I'll just have to restrain myself... Picaroon 17:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Advice needed: Regarding Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Freedom_skies/Evidence, are parties allowed to create sub-pages? (I'm thinking of Freedom skies' section in particular, but there are some others that also did the same thing) - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 20:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- It certainly wouldn't be necessary to have subpages if we were enforcing the length requirement on that case, but I've never been certain how vigorous we should be about that. Newyorkbrad 02:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've never been certain about how one "enforces" the length limit. Is it a polite request on their talk page, and an involuntary summarization (cutting out the adjectives and other uselessness) if they don't comply? Or should the sections just be summarized whenever a clerk thinks they're getting out of hand? Picaroon 02:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- I tend to look out only for the grosser violations and then drop the user a note asking for a shortening or clean-up within 24 hours. Sometimes it works. My personal view, though, has always been to allow any reasonable length, making an issue only of blatant excess. Some of the arbitrators are in agreement with that while others, principally UninvitedCompany and formerly Essjay, would prefer us to be stricter. Newyorkbrad 02:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Should I leave a note at their pages about it? - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 07:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- I tend to look out only for the grosser violations and then drop the user a note asking for a shortening or clean-up within 24 hours. Sometimes it works. My personal view, though, has always been to allow any reasonable length, making an issue only of blatant excess. Some of the arbitrators are in agreement with that while others, principally UninvitedCompany and formerly Essjay, would prefer us to be stricter. Newyorkbrad 02:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've never been certain about how one "enforces" the length limit. Is it a polite request on their talk page, and an involuntary summarization (cutting out the adjectives and other uselessness) if they don't comply? Or should the sections just be summarized whenever a clerk thinks they're getting out of hand? Picaroon 02:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- It certainly wouldn't be necessary to have subpages if we were enforcing the length requirement on that case, but I've never been certain how vigorous we should be about that. Newyorkbrad 02:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Seeking a volunteer to add the rejected/declined cases for March to the "rejected cases" page. I was going to do it this weekend, but have an unexpected commitment coming up for the next three or four days and will have reduced online time. Thanks to whoever. Newyorkbrad 02:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Will work on it either later today or Sunday. - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 07:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)